History:
L. 1992, ch. 280, § 29; L. 1993, ch. 264, § 12; L. 1995, ch. 160, § 6; L. 1996, ch. 265, § 4; L. 1997, ch. 189, § 1; L. 2002, ch. 196, § 5; L. 2005, ch. 194, § 17; L. 2006, ch. 197, § 19; L. 2007, ch. 185, § 3; L. 2009, ch. 139, § 3; L. 2014, ch. 93, § 42; Repealed, L. 2015, ch. 4, § 81; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Students and parents of students established an injury-in-fact, as required for article III standing to bring an action to challenge constitutionality of Kansas school district finance and quality performance act. Petrella v. Brownback, 697 F.3d 1285 (10th Cir. 2012).
2. The strict scrutiny test does not apply to cases that do not involve the abridgement of a fundamental right. Petrella v. Brownback, 980 F. Supp. 2d 1293 (2013).
3. Local option budget (LOB) cap was not facially unconstitutional under the 1st amendment. Petrella v. Brownback, 787 F.3d 1242, 1259 (10th Cir. 2015).
Gannon v. State, 368 P.3d 1024 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 13דIf the panel then determines those inequities are not cured, it should enjoin operation of the local option budget funding mechanism, K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 72-6433 and 72-6434, or enter such other orders as it deems appropriate.”
Gannon v. State, 319 P.3d 1196 (Kan. 2014). · cites it 8דDistricts with high assessed property values can reach the maximum LOB revenues of the ‘district prescribed percentage of the amount of state financial aid determined for the district in the school year’ (K.S.A. 72-6433[a][l], amended by S.B. 43, sec.”
Gannon v. State, 372 P.3d 1181 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 10ד72-8801; K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6433. In general, both were funded through optional additional mill levies on property in the district.”
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). · cites it 4דK.S.A. 72-6433. Be *247 cause of the cap imposed through the transitional state financial aid provision, some districts could not utilize the local option budget provisions or, at least, the full 25 percent allowed.”
Montoy v. State, 112 P.3d 923 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 2דDistricts with high assessed property values can reach the maximum LOB revenues of the “district prescribed percentage of the amount of state financial aid determined for the district in the school year” (K.S.A. 72-6433[a][1], amended by S.B. 43, sec.”
Hawley v. Kansas Dep't of Agric., 132 P.3d 870 (Kan. 2006). “72-8801(a) (board of education capital outlay); K.S.A. 72-6433(b) *620 (board of education local option budget).”
Gannon v. State, 357 P.3d 873 (Kan. 2015). “There we held on March 7, 2014: “If the panel then determines those inequities [regarding the LOB funding mechanism] are not cured, it should enjoin operation of the local option budget funding mechanism, K.”
Petrella v. Brownback, 980 F. Supp. 2d 1293 (D. Kan. 2013). · cites it 2ד§ 1983 , plaintiffs claim that the Local Option Budget (“LOB”) cap, found in K.S.A. § 72-6433(b), which limits the funds that a school district may raise by local tax, violates the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United…”
Bonner Springs Unified Sch. Dist. No. 204 v. Blue Valley Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229, 95 P.3d 655 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2ד72-6410), and specifies the limited extent to which local school district authorities may augment their budgets locally (K.S.A. 72-6433). The District Court erred in finding in the ‘donation’ provision of the statute a loophole that would permit school districts to receive an…”
Gannon v. State (Kan. 2017). · cites it 8ד95, § 15 with K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6433. But the state prescribed percentage—the statutory cap on the revenues it produces—is set at 33% of the school district's total foundation aid.”
Gannon v. State (Kan. 2015). “There we held on March 7, 2014: "If the panel then determines those inequities [regarding the LOB funding mechanism] are not cured, it should enjoin operation of the local option budget funding mechanism, K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 72-6433 and 72-6434, or enter such other orders as it…”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(a) — 1 case
Gannon v. State, 368 P.3d 1024 (Kan. 2016). “If the panel then determines those inequities are not cured, it should enjoin operation of the local option budget funding mechanism, K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 72-6433 and 72-6434, or enter such other orders as it deems appropriate.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(a)(1) — 1 case
Gannon v. State (Kan. 2017). “95, § 15 with K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6433. But the state prescribed percentage—the statutory cap on the revenues it produces—is set at 33% of the school district's total foundation aid.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(a)(1)(A) — 1 case
Montoy v. State, 112 P.3d 923 (Kan. 2005). “Districts with high assessed property values can reach the maximum LOB revenues of the “district prescribed percentage of the amount of state financial aid determined for the district in the school year” (K.S.A. 72-6433[a][1], amended by S.B. 43, sec.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(a)(l) — 1 case
Gannon v. State, 319 P.3d 1196 (Kan. 2014). “Districts with high assessed property values can reach the maximum LOB revenues of the ‘district prescribed percentage of the amount of state financial aid determined for the district in the school year’ (K.S.A. 72-6433[a][l], amended by S.B. 43, sec.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(b) — 2 cases
Hawley v. Kansas Dep't of Agric., 132 P.3d 870 (Kan. 2006). “72-8801(a) (board of education capital outlay); K.S.A. 72-6433(b) *620 (board of education local option budget).”
Petrella v. Brownback, 980 F. Supp. 2d 1293 (D. Kan. 2013). “§ 1983 , plaintiffs claim that the Local Option Budget (“LOB”) cap, found in K.S.A. § 72-6433(b), which limits the funds that a school district may raise by local tax, violates the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United…”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(b)(1) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “K.S.A. 72-6433. Be *247 cause of the cap imposed through the transitional state financial aid provision, some districts could not utilize the local option budget provisions or, at least, the full 25 percent allowed.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(b)(2) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “K.S.A. 72-6433. Be *247 cause of the cap imposed through the transitional state financial aid provision, some districts could not utilize the local option budget provisions or, at least, the full 25 percent allowed.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(b)(9)(B) — 1 case
Gannon v. State (Kan. 2017). “95, § 15 with K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6433. But the state prescribed percentage—the statutory cap on the revenues it produces—is set at 33% of the school district's total foundation aid.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(b)(l) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “K.S.A. 72-6433. Be *247 cause of the cap imposed through the transitional state financial aid provision, some districts could not utilize the local option budget provisions or, at least, the full 25 percent allowed.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(c) — 2 cases
Gannon v. State, 319 P.3d 1196 (Kan. 2014). “Districts with high assessed property values can reach the maximum LOB revenues of the ‘district prescribed percentage of the amount of state financial aid determined for the district in the school year’ (K.S.A. 72-6433[a][l], amended by S.B. 43, sec.”
Gannon v. State (Kan. 2017). “95, § 15 with K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6433. But the state prescribed percentage—the statutory cap on the revenues it produces—is set at 33% of the school district's total foundation aid.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(d) — 1 case
Gannon v. State, 319 P.3d 1196 (Kan. 2014). “Districts with high assessed property values can reach the maximum LOB revenues of the ‘district prescribed percentage of the amount of state financial aid determined for the district in the school year’ (K.S.A. 72-6433[a][l], amended by S.B. 43, sec.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(e) — 2 cases
Gannon v. State, 319 P.3d 1196 (Kan. 2014). “Districts with high assessed property values can reach the maximum LOB revenues of the ‘district prescribed percentage of the amount of state financial aid determined for the district in the school year’ (K.S.A. 72-6433[a][l], amended by S.B. 43, sec.”
Gannon v. State (Kan. 2017). “95, § 15 with K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6433. But the state prescribed percentage—the statutory cap on the revenues it produces—is set at 33% of the school district's total foundation aid.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(e)(1) — 1 case
Gannon v. State, 368 P.3d 1024 (Kan. 2016). “If the panel then determines those inequities are not cured, it should enjoin operation of the local option budget funding mechanism, K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 72-6433 and 72-6434, or enter such other orders as it deems appropriate.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(e)(2) — 2 cases
Gannon v. State, 368 P.3d 1024 (Kan. 2016). “If the panel then determines those inequities are not cured, it should enjoin operation of the local option budget funding mechanism, K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 72-6433 and 72-6434, or enter such other orders as it deems appropriate.”
Gannon v. State (Kan. 2017). “95, § 15 with K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6433. But the state prescribed percentage—the statutory cap on the revenues it produces—is set at 33% of the school district's total foundation aid.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6433(e)(l) — 1 case
Gannon v. State, 368 P.3d 1024 (Kan. 2016). “If the panel then determines those inequities are not cured, it should enjoin operation of the local option budget funding mechanism, K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 72-6433 and 72-6434, or enter such other orders as it deems appropriate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.