K.S.A. » Chapter 72
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 72-6434 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

72-6434.

History: L. 1992, ch. 280, § 30; L. 2003, ch. 139, § 3; L. 2005, ch. 152, § 24; L. 2005, ch. 2, § 12 (Special Session); L. 2006, ch. 197, § 20; L. 2007, ch. 195, § 35; L. 2015, ch. 4, § 38; L. 2015, ch. 92, § 7; Repealed, L. 2015, ch. 92, § 15; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. The state established unconstitutional, wealth-based disparities by prorating and reducing supplemental general state aid payments to which certain school districts were otherwise entitled. Gannon v. State, 298 Kan. 1107, 319 P.3d 1196 (2014).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1994–2017 · leading case: Gannon v. State, 368 P.3d 1024 (Kan. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gannon v. State, 368 P.3d 1024 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 10× “" K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6434. Supplemental general state aid was meant to better equalize the tax burdens for districts with less property wealth and was distributed as a percentage of a district's LOB- generated funds.”
Gannon v. State, 319 P.3d 1196 (Kan. 2014). · cites it 10× “We further hold that the panel correctly ruled that the State created unconstitutional, wealth-based disparities by prorating the supplemental general state aid payments to which certain districts were entitled under K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 72-6434 for their local option budgets.”
Gannon v. State, 372 P.3d 1181 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 4× “72-8814; K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6434. This AVPP schedule was then utilized in two distinct formulas to calculate what was commonly called "equalization aid" for the capital outlay and LOB funding.”
Montoy v. State, 138 P.3d 755 (Kan. 2006). · cites it 3× “K.S.A. 72-6434. The legislature has increased equalization in two ways.”
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “K.S.A. 72-6434. In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.”
Gannon v. State (Kan. 2017). · cites it 3× “, K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6434. See L. 2017, ch.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6434(a) — 4 cases
Gannon v. State, 368 P.3d 1024 (Kan. 2016). “" K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6434. Supplemental general state aid was meant to better equalize the tax burdens for districts with less property wealth and was distributed as a percentage of a district's LOB- generated funds.”
Gannon v. State, 319 P.3d 1196 (Kan. 2014). “We further hold that the panel correctly ruled that the State created unconstitutional, wealth-based disparities by prorating the supplemental general state aid payments to which certain districts were entitled under K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 72-6434 for their local option budgets.”
Montoy v. State, 138 P.3d 755 (Kan. 2006). “K.S.A. 72-6434. The legislature has increased equalization in two ways.”
Gannon v. State (Kan. 2017). “, K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 72-6434. See L. 2017, ch.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6434(b) — 1 case
Gannon v. State, 319 P.3d 1196 (Kan. 2014). “We further hold that the panel correctly ruled that the State created unconstitutional, wealth-based disparities by prorating the supplemental general state aid payments to which certain districts were entitled under K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 72-6434 for their local option budgets.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.