Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 72-6439 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

72-6439.

History: L. 1992, ch. 280, § 35; L. 1995, ch. 263, § 1; L. 2004, ch. 124, § 3; L. 2006, ch. 197, § 22; Repealed, L. 2015, ch. 4, § 81; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Cited; whether school district finance and quality performance act (L. 1992, Ch. 280) makes suitable provision for public education finance examined. U.S.D. No. 229 v. State, 256 Kan. 232, 235, 254, 885 P.2d 1170 (1994).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1994–2014 · leading case: Montoy v. State, 120 P.3d 306 (Kan. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Montoy v. State, 120 P.3d 306 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 8× “72-6439(a) were removed; (2) the SDFQPA's provision requiring an oversight committee to ensure fair and equitable funding was allowed to expire; (3) the low enrollment weighting was changed; (4) correlation weighting was added; (5) at-risk pupil weighting was changed; (6) the…”
COPE v. Kansas State Bd. of Educ., 71 F. Supp. 3d 1233 (D. Kan. 2014). · cites it 14× “(K.S.A. § 72-6439 is contained in the SDFQPA.”
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). · cites it 9× “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
Gannon v. State, 319 P.3d 1196 (Kan. 2014). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 72-6439.' ” 256 Kan. at 257 . The district court eventually consolidated Rose’s seven goals of an adequate education into six.”
Montoy v. State, 62 P.3d 228 (Kan. 2003). · cites it 3× “” K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 72-6439(a). While the amendment to K.”
Montoy v. State, 112 P.3d 923 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 2× “at 773 (quoting K.S.A. 72-6439) (constitutionally suitable education is one in which “schools meet the accreditation requirements and [students are] achieving an ‘improvement in performance that reflects high academic standards and is measurable.”
Montoy v. State, 138 P.3d 755 (Kan. 2006). “As long as the target model for a constitutionally adequate education continues to move, the litigation in this case could continue in perpetuity.”
Robinson v. Kansas, 506 F. Supp. 2d 488 (D. Kan. 2007). · cites it 3× “’ K.S.A. 72-6439(a). Moreover, the legislature mandated standards for individual and school performance levels ‘the achievement of which represents excellence in the academic area at the grade level to which the assessment applies.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(a) — 5 cases
Montoy v. State, 120 P.3d 306 (Kan. 2005). “72-6439(a) were removed; (2) the SDFQPA's provision requiring an oversight committee to ensure fair and equitable funding was allowed to expire; (3) the low enrollment weighting was changed; (4) correlation weighting was added; (5) at-risk pupil weighting was changed; (6) the…”
Montoy v. State, 62 P.3d 228 (Kan. 2003). “” K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 72-6439(a). While the amendment to K.”
Montoy v. State, 112 P.3d 923 (Kan. 2005). “at 773 (quoting K.S.A. 72-6439) (constitutionally suitable education is one in which “schools meet the accreditation requirements and [students are] achieving an ‘improvement in performance that reflects high academic standards and is measurable.”
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
Robinson v. Kansas, 506 F. Supp. 2d 488 (D. Kan. 2007). “’ K.S.A. 72-6439(a). Moreover, the legislature mandated standards for individual and school performance levels ‘the achievement of which represents excellence in the academic area at the grade level to which the assessment applies.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(b) — 1 case
COPE v. Kansas State Bd. of Educ., 71 F. Supp. 3d 1233 (D. Kan. 2014). “(K.S.A. § 72-6439 is contained in the SDFQPA.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(c) — 2 cases
Montoy v. State, 120 P.3d 306 (Kan. 2005). “72-6439(a) were removed; (2) the SDFQPA's provision requiring an oversight committee to ensure fair and equitable funding was allowed to expire; (3) the low enrollment weighting was changed; (4) correlation weighting was added; (5) at-risk pupil weighting was changed; (6) the…”
Robinson v. Kansas, 506 F. Supp. 2d 488 (D. Kan. 2007). “’ K.S.A. 72-6439(a). Moreover, the legislature mandated standards for individual and school performance levels ‘the achievement of which represents excellence in the academic area at the grade level to which the assessment applies.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(c)(3) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(c)(l) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(e) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(g) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.