Montoy v. State, 120 P.3d 306 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 8ד72-6439(a) were removed; (2) the SDFQPA's provision requiring an oversight committee to ensure fair and equitable funding was allowed to expire; (3) the low enrollment weighting was changed; (4) correlation weighting was added; (5) at-risk pupil weighting was changed; (6) the…”
COPE v. Kansas State Bd. of Educ., 71 F. Supp. 3d 1233 (D. Kan. 2014). · cites it 14ד(K.S.A. § 72-6439 is contained in the SDFQPA.”
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). · cites it 9דIn order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
Gannon v. State, 319 P.3d 1196 (Kan. 2014). · cites it 2דK.S.A. 72-6439.' ” 256 Kan. at 257 . The district court eventually consolidated Rose’s seven goals of an adequate education into six.”
Montoy v. State, 62 P.3d 228 (Kan. 2003). · cites it 3ד” K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 72-6439(a). While the amendment to K.”
Montoy v. State, 112 P.3d 923 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 2דat 773 (quoting K.S.A. 72-6439) (constitutionally suitable education is one in which “schools meet the accreditation requirements and [students are] achieving an ‘improvement in performance that reflects high academic standards and is measurable.”
Montoy v. State, 138 P.3d 755 (Kan. 2006). “As long as the target model for a constitutionally adequate education continues to move, the litigation in this case could continue in perpetuity.”
Robinson v. Kansas, 506 F. Supp. 2d 488 (D. Kan. 2007). · cites it 3ד’ K.S.A. 72-6439(a). Moreover, the legislature mandated standards for individual and school performance levels ‘the achievement of which represents excellence in the academic area at the grade level to which the assessment applies.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(a) — 5 cases
Montoy v. State, 120 P.3d 306 (Kan. 2005). “72-6439(a) were removed; (2) the SDFQPA's provision requiring an oversight committee to ensure fair and equitable funding was allowed to expire; (3) the low enrollment weighting was changed; (4) correlation weighting was added; (5) at-risk pupil weighting was changed; (6) the…”
Montoy v. State, 62 P.3d 228 (Kan. 2003). “” K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 72-6439(a). While the amendment to K.”
Montoy v. State, 112 P.3d 923 (Kan. 2005). “at 773 (quoting K.S.A. 72-6439) (constitutionally suitable education is one in which “schools meet the accreditation requirements and [students are] achieving an ‘improvement in performance that reflects high academic standards and is measurable.”
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
Robinson v. Kansas, 506 F. Supp. 2d 488 (D. Kan. 2007). “’ K.S.A. 72-6439(a). Moreover, the legislature mandated standards for individual and school performance levels ‘the achievement of which represents excellence in the academic area at the grade level to which the assessment applies.”
Montoy v. State, 120 P.3d 306 (Kan. 2005). “72-6439(a) were removed; (2) the SDFQPA's provision requiring an oversight committee to ensure fair and equitable funding was allowed to expire; (3) the low enrollment weighting was changed; (4) correlation weighting was added; (5) at-risk pupil weighting was changed; (6) the…”
Robinson v. Kansas, 506 F. Supp. 2d 488 (D. Kan. 2007). “’ K.S.A. 72-6439(a). Moreover, the legislature mandated standards for individual and school performance levels ‘the achievement of which represents excellence in the academic area at the grade level to which the assessment applies.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(c)(3) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(c)(l) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(e) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
— K.S.A. § 72-6439(g) — 1 case
Unified Sch. Dist. No. 229 v. State, 885 P.2d 1170 (Kan. 1994). “In order to accomplish the mission of Kansas education (K.S.A. 72-6439), the Act also contains provisions mandating the adoption of a Quality Performance Accreditation (QPA) system for Kansas schools.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.