75-2929h.
Same; appeals from orders of board.
Subject to the provisions of this section, the Kansas judicial review act shall be applicable to appeals from orders of the civil service board. In any such appeal, the civil service board shall not be a named party to the proceedings. Parties to such appeals shall be: (a) The aggrieved employee, former employee or applicant; (b) the state agency that took the action that was appealed to the civil service board; and (c) any party the district court permits to intervene in the district court action. An order of the civil service board may be affirmed, reversed or modified by the district court on appeal. Applications for a stay or other temporary remedies shall be to the state agency that took the action that was appealed to the civil service board.
History:
L. 1984, ch. 338, § 28; L. 2010, ch. 17, § 197; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Res judicata precluded assertion of retaliatory discharge claim by former state employee where claim had been subject of full hearing by civil service board and state court appellate process. Morales v. Kansas State University, 727 F. Supp. 1389 (1989).
2. Order of state civil service board regarding dismissal for conduct constituting per se cause for discipline examined. Sanstra v. Kansas Highway Patrol, 15 Kan. App. 2d 148, 149, 804 P.2d 1007 (1991).
Jones v. Kansas State Univ., 106 P.3d 10 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 2דK.S.A. 75-2929h. K.S.A. 77-621(c) sets forth the following applicable scope of review: "(4) the agency has erroneously interpreted or applied the law; .”
Connelly v. Kansas High. Patrol, 26 P.3d 1246 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 2דWe are also not convinced by the argument that the scope of review of the rulings of the KCSB under K.S.A. 75-2929h and K.S.A. 77-621 is so limited that it somehow makes the administrative proceedings inadequate.”
Kansas Dep't of Revenue v. Powell, 232 P.3d 856 (Kan. 2010). “, no employer was eligible: “A court may also award such officer or employee all or a portion of the costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney fees and witness fees.”
Hill v. State, 388 P.3d 122 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). “K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 75-2929h of the KCSA states that “the Kansas judicial review act shall be applicable to appeals from orders of the civil service board.”
Morales v. Kansas State Univ., 727 F. Supp. 1389 (D. Kan. 1989). “K.S.A. 75-2929h; K.S.A. 77-607. The state district court’s review is not de novo and is limited in scope.”
Brown v. Youth Ctr. at Topeka, 883 F. Supp. 572 (D. Kan. 1995). “75-2929d(b) (providing that "[h]earings shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Kansas administrative procedure act”); K.”
State Bank Comm'r v. Emery, 880 P.2d 783 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2דPursuant to K.S.A. 75-2929h, Emery was the proper party.”
Sanstra v. Kansas High. Patrol, 804 P.2d 1009 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “K.S.A. 75-2929h provides that orders of the civil service board are subject to judicial review in accordance with the Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement of Agency Actions, K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.