Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 79-1427a (2026)

Listing and appraisal of escaped personal property; duties of county appraisers; penalty; distribution of taxes paid under protest; grievances, procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

79-1427a. Listing and appraisal of escaped personal property; duties of county appraisers; penalty; distribution of taxes paid under protest; grievances, procedure. (a) If, the county appraiser discovers, after the tax roll has been certified to the county clerk, that any tangible personal property subject to taxation has been omitted from the tax rolls, the county clerk shall place such property on the tax roll as an added tax, or if, after one year from the date prescribed by K.S.A. 79-306, and amendments thereto, for the listing of tangible personal property, the county appraiser discovers that any tangible personal property that was subject to taxation in any year or years within two years next preceding January 1 of the calendar year in which it was discovered has not been listed or has been underreported for whatever reason, such property shall be deemed to have escaped taxation. In the case of property that has not been listed, it shall be the duty of the county appraiser to list and appraise such property and, for an added tax, add penalties as prescribed in K.S.A. 79-1422, and amendments thereto, and that shall be designated on the appraisal roll as an added appraisal for that year. In the case of property that has escaped taxation, it shall be the duty of the county appraiser to list and appraise such property and add 12.5% thereto as a penalty for escaping taxation for each such year during which such property was not listed, and it shall be designated on the appraisal roll as "escaped appraisal" for each such preceding year or years. In the case of property that has been listed but underreported, it shall be the duty of the county appraiser to list and appraise the underreported portion of such property and add 12.5% thereto as a penalty for escaping taxation for each such year during which such property was underreported, and it shall be designated on the appraisal roll as "escaped appraisal" for each such preceding year or years. The county clerk, upon receipt of the valuation for such property in either of the aforementioned cases, shall place such property on the tax rolls and compute the amount of tax due based upon the mill levy for the year or years in which such tax should have been levied, and shall certify such amount to the county treasurer as an added or escaped appraisal. The amount of such tax shall be due immediately and payable within 45 days after the issuance of an additional or escaped property tax bill by the county treasurer. The county treasurer may not distribute any taxes assessed under this section and paid under protest by the taxpayer pursuant to K.S.A. 79-2005, and amendments thereto, until such time as the appeal is final. No interest shall be imposed unless the tax remains unpaid after such 45-day period. Taxes levied pursuant to this section that remain unpaid after such 45-day period shall be deemed delinquent and the county treasurer shall collect and distribute such tax in the same manner as prescribed by law for the collection and distribution of other taxes levied upon property that are delinquent. If the owner of such property is deceased, taxes charged as herein provided shall be levied against the estate of such deceased person for only two calendar years preceding death and shall be paid by the legal representative or representatives of such estate. In the event that such escaped appraisal is due to any willful or clerical error of the county appraiser, such property shall be appraised at its fair market value and no penalty shall be added.

(b) A taxpayer with a grievance as to any penalty applied pursuant to the provisions of this section, may appeal to the state board of tax appeals on forms prepared by the state board of tax appeals and provided by the county appraiser. The state board of tax appeals shall have the authority to abate any penalty imposed under the provisions of this section and order the refund of the abated penalty, whenever excusable neglect on the part of the person required to make and file the statement listing property for assessment and taxation purposes is shown, or whenever the property that has been deemed to have escaped taxation is repossessed, judicially or otherwise, by a secured creditor and such creditor pays the taxes and interest due. No interest shall be assessed during the pendency of this appeal.

(c) The provisions of this section shall apply to any tangible personal property discovered during the calendar years 1982, 1983, 1984 and any year thereafter to have escaped appraisal and taxation during any such year or any year within two years next preceding any such year.

History: L. 1985, ch. 309, § 1; L. 1987, ch. 372, § 3; L. 1990, ch. 346, § 1; L. 1995, ch. 38, § 1; L. 2004, ch. 173, § 10; L. 2008, ch. 109, § 86; L. 2014, ch. 141, § 95; L. 2024, ch. 81, § 12; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1988–2012 · leading case: In Re Fleet for Relief From a Tax Grievance, 272 P.3d 583 (Kan. 2012).
In Re Fleet for Relief From a Tax Grievance, 272 P.3d 583 (Kan. 2012). · cites it 12× “79-214 is violated; and (3) K.S.A. 79-1427a, which pertains to personal property discovered to have been omitted from the tax rolls and is commonly referred to as escaped property.”
In Re Application of Am. Restaurant Operations, 957 P.2d 473 (Kan. 1998). · cites it 12× “The County claims that (1) it was error to give retrospective effect to an amendment to K.S.A. 79-1427a, which was enacted while the case was pending in the district court; (2) it was error for BOTA to reduce the taxpayer’s penalties from 100% to 10% on the 1986, 1987, 1988, and…”
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Parrish, 891 P.2d 445 (Kan. 1995). · cites it 9× “If, from and after January 1, 1994, and on or before March 14, 1995, the county or district appraiser discovers any taxable tangible personal property which would be subject to a penalty pursuant to the provisions of K.S.A. 79-1427a, and amendments thereto, such property shall…”
In Re the Protest of United Ag Servs., Inc., 159 P.3d 1050 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “In K.S.A. 79-1427a, the legislature permits escaped tax assessments where personal property “has been underreported for whatever reason.”
Dillon Stores v. Lovelady, 855 P.2d 487 (Kan. 1993). · cites it 2× “Taxpayers contend that under K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 79-1427a and K.S.A. 79-1461, the county appraiser has the sole and exclusive duty to investigate, list, and appraise escaped or underreported taxable property.”
In re Unified Sch. Dist. No. 437, 757 P.2d 314 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 2× “The legislature also overrode In re Order of Board of Tax Appeals’ definition of “escaped taxation” by enacting K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 79-1427a and K.S.A. 1987 Supp.”
Stores v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 912 P.2d 170 (Kan. 1996). “The trial court found that, under K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 79-1427a(a) and (c), the County had “discovered” the escaped property on the date that the assessments were placed on the Sedgwick County tax roll.”
J. Enter., Inc. v. Bd. of Harvey Cnty. Comm'rs, 857 P.2d 666 (Kan. 1993). “The County also assessed a 100% penalty pursuant to K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 79-1427a. Colortyme filed an action for declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to K.”
Bd. of Sedgwick Cnty. Commissioners v. Dillon Stores, 962 P.2d 1120 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 7× “Robert Bell, who was assigned to try the first action, which we will refer to as Dillon I, and he made the following significant rulings: (a) K.S.A. 79-1427a prohibits the collection of escaped taxes to the 4 years prior to the time of discovery.”
— K.S.A. § 79-1427a(a) — 3 cases
In Re Fleet for Relief From a Tax Grievance, 272 P.3d 583 (Kan. 2012). “79-214 is violated; and (3) K.S.A. 79-1427a, which pertains to personal property discovered to have been omitted from the tax rolls and is commonly referred to as escaped property.”
Stores v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 912 P.2d 170 (Kan. 1996). “The trial court found that, under K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 79-1427a(a) and (c), the County had “discovered” the escaped property on the date that the assessments were placed on the Sedgwick County tax roll.”
Bd. of Sedgwick Cnty. Commissioners v. Dillon Stores, 962 P.2d 1120 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “Robert Bell, who was assigned to try the first action, which we will refer to as Dillon I, and he made the following significant rulings: (a) K.S.A. 79-1427a prohibits the collection of escaped taxes to the 4 years prior to the time of discovery.”
— K.S.A. § 79-1427a(b) — 2 cases
In Re Application of Am. Restaurant Operations, 957 P.2d 473 (Kan. 1998). “The County claims that (1) it was error to give retrospective effect to an amendment to K.S.A. 79-1427a, which was enacted while the case was pending in the district court; (2) it was error for BOTA to reduce the taxpayer’s penalties from 100% to 10% on the 1986, 1987, 1988, and…”
Bd. of Sedgwick Cnty. Commissioners v. Dillon Stores, 962 P.2d 1120 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “Robert Bell, who was assigned to try the first action, which we will refer to as Dillon I, and he made the following significant rulings: (a) K.S.A. 79-1427a prohibits the collection of escaped taxes to the 4 years prior to the time of discovery.”
— K.S.A. § 79-1427a(c) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Parrish, 891 P.2d 445 (Kan. 1995). “If, from and after January 1, 1994, and on or before March 14, 1995, the county or district appraiser discovers any taxable tangible personal property which would be subject to a penalty pursuant to the provisions of K.S.A. 79-1427a, and amendments thereto, such property shall…”
In Re Application of Am. Restaurant Operations, 957 P.2d 473 (Kan. 1998). “The County claims that (1) it was error to give retrospective effect to an amendment to K.S.A. 79-1427a, which was enacted while the case was pending in the district court; (2) it was error for BOTA to reduce the taxpayer’s penalties from 100% to 10% on the 1986, 1987, 1988, and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.