K.S.A. » Chapter 08
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 8-1335 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

8-1335.

History: L. 1974, ch. 29, § 2; Repealed, L. 1996, ch. 15, § 11; March 7.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. P.I.K. instruction based on K.S.A. 8-532(c) in error due to significant change in statutory language. Eckdall v. Negley, 5 Kan. App. 2d 724, 726, 727, 624 P.2d 473.

2. Mentioned in discussing meaning of "reasonable"; not unconstitutionally vague as used in K.S.A. 21-3608(1)(b). State v. Fisher, 230 Kan. 192, 193, 631 P.2d 239 (1981).

3. Conviction affirmed; admissibility of blood alcohol test (K.S.A. 8-1001), abuse in sentencing (K.S.A. 21-4601 et seq.), underlying crimes of aggravated vehicular homicide (K.S.A. 21-3405a) examined. State v. Louis, 240 Kan. 175, 176, 727 P.2d 483 (1986).

4. Cited; various driving and road conditions as proximate cause of accident resulting in aggravated vehicular homicide charge (K.S.A. 21-3405a) examined. State v. Hickey, 12 Kan. App. 2d 781, 782, 784, 757 P.2d 735 (1988).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1977–2001 · leading case: State v. Fisher, 631 P.2d 239 (Kan. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Fisher, 631 P.2d 239 (Kan. 1981). “See K.S.A. 8-1335, -1557, and L. 1913, ch. 65, § 7.”
State v. Hickey, 757 P.2d 735 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 8-1335. After a jury trial, Hickey was found guilty on all counts.”
Eckdall v. Negley, 624 P.2d 473 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 3× “8-1340), but enacted an identical provision to be effective during the time 8-1557 is suspended (K.S.A. 8-1335). Thus, on the date of the accident in this case, the duty of a driver approaching and crossing an intersection in Kansas was and is now controlled by K.”
Carlson v. Ferguson, 17 P.3d 333 (Kan. 2001). “2d at 726 (quoting K.S.A. 8-1335). Thus, the reduction in speed requirement was eliminated.”
State v. Louis, 727 P.2d 483 (Kan. 1986). “8-1567); failure to decrease speed (K.S.A. 8-1335); and failure to obey a traffic control device (K.”
State v. Herber, 573 P.2d 1112 (Kan. Ct. App. 1977). “(a) Éxcept when a special hazard exists that requires lower speed for compliance with K.S.A. 8-1335, the limit specified in this section or established as hereinafter authorized shall be maximum lawful speeds and no person shall drive a vehicle in excess of such maximum speed…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.