K.S.A. » Chapter 08
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 8-234 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

8-234.

History: L. 1937, ch. 73, § 1; L. 1949, ch. 104, § 1; L. 1959, ch. 49 § 1; L. 1963, ch. 402, § 1; L. 1967, ch. 59, § 3; L. 1972, ch. 342, § 39; L. 1974, ch. 38, § 1; Repealed, L. 1975, ch. 36, § 33; January 1, 1976.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1977–2000 · leading case: State v. Wood, 647 P.2d 1327 (Kan. 1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Wood, 647 P.2d 1327 (Kan. 1982). “8-285 reads: “As used in this act, the words and phrases defined in K.S.A. 8-234 shall have the meanings ascribed to them therein, and the term ‘habitual violator’ shall mean any resident or nonresident person who, within the immediately preceding five (5) years, has been…”
City of Overland Park v. Rice, 567 P.2d 1382 (Kan. 1977). · cites it 2× “(K.S.A. 1972 Supp. 8-234 thru K.S.A. 8-271.”
State v. Heironimus, 941 P.2d 1356 (Kan. 1997). “8-255(c) as not applicable to habitual violator revocations because the 8-255(c) procedures were part of the Motor Vehicle Drivers’ License Act, K.S.A. 8-234 through K.S.A. 8-271, which is separate from the HVS.”
State v. Fish, 612 P.2d 180 (Kan. 1980). “As used in this act, the words and phrases defined in K.S.A. 8-234 shall have the meanings ascribed to them therein, and the term ‘habitual violator’ shall mean any resident or nonresident person who, within the immediately preceding five (5) years, has been convicted in this or…”
State v. Marshall, 845 P.2d 659 (Kan. 1993). “2d 1382 (1977), wherein we reversed a driving while license suspended conviction because the period of suspension in the suspension order did not have specific beginning and ending dates as required by K.S.A. 1972 Supp. 8-234(r) (repealed L. 1975, ch.”
Briggs v. Walker, 88 F. Supp. 2d 1196 (D. Kan. 2000). · cites it 2× “§ 8-239 on instruction permits as separate from and without reference to any other provisions under the Kansas Motor Vehicle Drivers’ License Act, K.S.A. § 8-234 et seq. The court rejects that reading as unduly narrow and unsupported by the general terms of the Act.”
State v. Walden, 803 P.2d 1054 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). “The court determined that the division suspension order did not comply with the statutory definition of suspension of driver’s license in K.S.A. 1972 Supp. 8-234(r) (now K.S.A. 8-1474), since it did not withdraw the privilege to operate a motor vehicle “ ‘for a period…”
State v. Topping, 660 P.2d 578 (Kan. Ct. App. 1983). “It reads as follows: “As used in this act, the words and phrases defined in K.S.A. 8-234 shall have the meanings ascribed to them therein, and the term ‘habitual violator’ shall mean any resident or nonresident person who, within the immediately preceding five (5)years, has been…”
— K.S.A. § 8-234(r) — 2 cases
State v. Marshall, 845 P.2d 659 (Kan. 1993). “2d 1382 (1977), wherein we reversed a driving while license suspended conviction because the period of suspension in the suspension order did not have specific beginning and ending dates as required by K.S.A. 1972 Supp. 8-234(r) (repealed L. 1975, ch.”
State v. Walden, 803 P.2d 1054 (Kan. Ct. App. 1990). “The court determined that the division suspension order did not comply with the statutory definition of suspension of driver’s license in K.S.A. 1972 Supp. 8-234(r) (now K.S.A. 8-1474), since it did not withdraw the privilege to operate a motor vehicle “ ‘for a period…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.