History:
L. 1957, ch. 68, § 1; L. 1972, ch. 342, § 52; Repealed, L. 1973, ch. 198, § 22; January 1, 1974; L. 1974, ch. 193, § 22; February 22.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Purpose of act; fault or liability immaterial in determining security or suspension; appeal. Agee v. Kansas Highway Commission, 198 Kan. 173, 174, 422 P.2d 949.
2. Act held constitutional. State v. Finley, 198 Kan. 585, 601, 426 P.2d 251. Judgment vacated: State v. Finley, 199 Kan. 615, 433 P.2d 414.
3. Purpose of act; insuring against punitive damages contrary to public policy. American Surety Company of New York v. Gold, 375 F.2d 523, 524, 527.
4. Liability insurance is not condition precedent to operating an automobile. Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 204 Kan. 694, 695, 466 P.2d 336.
5. Provision in automobile liability policy furnished pursuant to statute may not conflict with statutory requirements or provision is void. Canal Insurance Co. v. Sinclair, 208 Kan. 753, 760, 761, 494 P.2d 1197.
6. Mentioned in finding K.S.A. 40-1110 permissive as to supplemental coverage and policy not in conflict. Simpson v. KFB Insurance Co. Inc., 209 Kan. 620, 627, 498 P.2d 71.
7. Mentioned; action for garnishment of insurer; third party beneficiary aspects of liability insurance contracts discussed. Nichols v. Marshall, 491 F.2d 177, 180.
8. Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act was predecessor to Automobile Injury Reparations Act (K.S.A. 40-3101 et seq.). Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474, 477, 625 P.2d 478.
DeWitt v. Young, 625 P.2d 478 (Kan. 1981). “The Kansas Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act, K.S.A. 8-722 et seq. (Corrick), predecessor to K.”
Barnes v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 714 P.2d 975 (Kan. 1986). · cites it 2דAs previously pointed out the KAIRA includes provisions of both types of laws as did its predecessor, the motor vehicle safety responsibility act, K.S.A. 8-722 et seq. (Corrick). The determination of a person's due process rights cannot hinge upon what title or designation may…”
Tyler v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co., 49 P.3d 511 (Kan. 2002). “2d 1197 (1972) (person named in certificate of title is owner as defined in K.S.A. 8-722 [repealed in 1973]), and Grimmett v.”
Bartee v. R.T.C. Transp., Inc., 781 P.2d 1084 (Kan. 1989). “According to this argument, to be an automobile liability insurance policy, the policy itself must insure the operation of a specified motor vehicle or a specified individual operating a non-owned vehicle as defined in K.”
State v. Finley, 426 P.2d 251 (Kan. 1967). “Accordingly, it is held the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act which requires the Department (the Vehicle Department of the State Highway Commission K.S.A. 8-722) to summarily suspend the license of a financially irresponsible driver involved in an accident, who falls…”
Nichols v. Marshall, 491 F.2d 177 (10th Cir. 1974). “In such public interest Kansas has enacted the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act, K.S.A. 8-722 et seq., which Act, according to Finley, is designed to 'promote safety on the highways by protecting the users against financially irresponsible persons .”
Nichols v. Marshall, 491 F.2d 177 (10th Cir. 1974). “In such public interest Kansas has enacted the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act, K.S.A. 8-722 et seq., which Act, according to Finley , is designed to “promote safety on the highways by protecting the users against financially irresponsible persons .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.