Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 84-9-602 (2026)

Waiver and variance of rights and duties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

84-9-602. Waiver and variance of rights and duties. Except as otherwise provided in K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-624, and amendments thereto, to the extent that they give rights to a debtor or obligor and impose duties on a secured party, the debtor or obligor may not waive or vary the rules stated in the following listed sections:

(1) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-207(b)(4)(C), and amendments thereto, which deals with use and operation of the collateral by the secured party;

(2) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-210, and amendments thereto, which deals with requests for an accounting and requests concerning a list of collateral and statement of account;

(3) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-607(c), and amendments thereto, which deals with collection and enforcement of collateral;

(4) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-608(a) and 84-9-615(c), and amendments thereto, to the extent that they deal with application or payment of noncash proceeds of collection, enforcement, or disposition;

(5) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-608(a) and 84-9-615(d), and amendments thereto, to the extent that they require accounting for or payment of surplus proceeds of collateral;

(6) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-609, and amendments thereto, to the extent that it imposes upon a secured party that takes possession of collateral without judicial process the duty to do so without breach of the peace;

(7) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-610(b), 84-9-611, 84-9-613 and 84-9-614, and amendments thereto, which deal with disposition of collateral;

(8) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-615(f), and amendments thereto, which deals with calculation of a deficiency or surplus when a disposition is made to the secured party, a person related to the secured party, or a secondary obligor;

(9) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-616, and amendments thereto, which deals with explanation of the calculation of a surplus or deficiency;

(10) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-620, 84-9-621 and 84-9-622, and amendments thereto, which deal with acceptance of collateral in satisfaction of obligation;

(11) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-623, and amendments thereto, which deals with redemption of collateral;

(12) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-624, and amendments thereto, which deals with permissible waivers; and

(13) K.S.A. 2025 Supp. 84-9-625 and 84-9-626, and amendments thereto, which deal with the secured liability for failure to comply with this article.

History: L. 2000, ch. 142, § 100; July 1, 2001.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2021 · leading case: Born v. Born, 374 P.3d 624 (Kan. 2016).
Born v. Born, 374 P.3d 624 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 9× “84-9-601(a) indicates that the statutory remedies on default are in addition to “those [remedies] provided by agreement of the parties,” so long as the agreement does not contravene the nonwaiver provisions of K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 84-9-602. Nevertheless, the Court of Appeals…”
Kuhn v. Wagnon (In Re Kuhn), 408 B.R. 528 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2009). “After default, a secured party has the rights provided in this part and, except as otherwise provided in K.S.A. 84-9-602 and amendments thereto, those provided by agreement of the parties.”
McLinn v. Thomas Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't (D. Kan. 2021). “” K.S.A. 84-9-602(6). Moreover, even assuming the loan agreement included some form of consent, any such consent was revoked by McLinn when he demanded that Ryburn leave the F350 and get off the property.”
— K.S.A. § 84-9-602(10) — 1 case
Born v. Born, 374 P.3d 624 (Kan. 2016). “84-9-601(a) indicates that the statutory remedies on default are in addition to “those [remedies] provided by agreement of the parties,” so long as the agreement does not contravene the nonwaiver provisions of K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 84-9-602. Nevertheless, the Court of Appeals…”
— K.S.A. § 84-9-602(6) — 1 case
McLinn v. Thomas Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't (D. Kan. 2021). “” K.S.A. 84-9-602(6). Moreover, even assuming the loan agreement included some form of consent, any such consent was revoked by McLinn when he demanded that Ryburn leave the F350 and get off the property.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.