Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 100
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.082 (2026)

Repealed, 1966

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Powers and duties of board as to appeals, petitions, granting of variances. History: Repealed 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 172, sec. 91. -- Created 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 176, sec. 10.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1945–1959 · leading case: Thomson v. Tafel, 218 S.W.2d 977 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Thomson v. Tafel, 218 S.W.2d 977 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). · cites it 4× “Paragraph 3 alleges, that the order was adopted under the ostensible authority of paragraph 3 of section 20 of the zoning ordinance of July 8,1931, which is void because the City Council was without statutory authority to adopt it, such authority not being conferred by KRS…”
Kline v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment & Appeals, 325 S.W.2d 324 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). · cites it 3× “Subsection (2) of KRS 100.082 is devoted to the board’s authority as regards holding hearings on and deciding petitions for special exceptions to the requirements of zoning regulations or restrictions.”
Stout v. Jenkins, 268 S.W.2d 643 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). · cites it 3× “The Zoning Commission’s order is based on KRS 100.082, which provides for a variance : “ * * * To relieve' difficulties or hardships in cases when and where, by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of property * * * or by reason of…”
Willoughby v. Tafel, 190 S.W.2d 475 (Ky. Ct. App. 1945). “078, and the several sections immediately following, that only two material questions are presented by the record: (1) Did the Board have authority to authorize the variance? and (2) Were the facts sufficient to sustain their exercise of that authority? (1) The first question,…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.082(3) — 1 case
Thomson v. Tafel, 218 S.W.2d 977 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). “Paragraph 3 alleges, that the order was adopted under the ostensible authority of paragraph 3 of section 20 of the zoning ordinance of July 8,1931, which is void because the City Council was without statutory authority to adopt it, such authority not being conferred by KRS…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.