Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 100
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.350 (2026)

Repealed, 1966

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Powers of commission. History: Repealed 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 172, sec. 91. -- Amended 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 297, sec. 2. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 161, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 3235f-3.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1955–1967 · leading case: Pierson Trapp Co. v. Peak, 340 S.W.2d 456 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pierson Trapp Co. v. Peak, 340 S.W.2d 456 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). · cites it 2× “It is fuythqr to be noted that the resolution section in question does not purport to place any controls over the construction of shopping centers in districts that already are zoned commercial. So the resolution seems to create a shopping center classification only as to…”
Fritts v. City of Ashland, 348 S.W.2d 712 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “This plan, in accordance with KRS 100.350(1) (which refers to KRS 100.046), 100.”
Am. Sign Corp. v. Fowler, 276 S.W.2d 651 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “For ex-ample, KRS 100.350(4), relating to zoning in cities of the second class, states that regulations may be made governing “the height, number of stories and size of buildings and other structures, the percentage of lots that may be occupied, the size of yards, courts and…”
Cent. Kentucky Dev. Co. v. Knippenberg, 416 S.W.2d 745 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). “In the first place, the Commission has power under KRS 100.350 to obtain any pertinent information which would assist it in determining upon a proper land use.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.350(1) — 1 case
Fritts v. City of Ashland, 348 S.W.2d 712 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “This plan, in accordance with KRS 100.350(1) (which refers to KRS 100.046), 100.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.350(4) — 1 case
Am. Sign Corp. v. Fowler, 276 S.W.2d 651 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “For ex-ample, KRS 100.350(4), relating to zoning in cities of the second class, states that regulations may be made governing “the height, number of stories and size of buildings and other structures, the percentage of lots that may be occupied, the size of yards, courts and…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.350(5) — 1 case
Pierson Trapp Co. v. Peak, 340 S.W.2d 456 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). “It is fuythqr to be noted that the resolution section in question does not purport to place any controls over the construction of shopping centers in districts that already are zoned commercial. So the resolution seems to create a shopping center classification only as to…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.350(6) — 1 case
Pierson Trapp Co. v. Peak, 340 S.W.2d 456 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). “It is fuythqr to be noted that the resolution section in question does not purport to place any controls over the construction of shopping centers in districts that already are zoned commercial. So the resolution seems to create a shopping center classification only as to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.