Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 100
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.360 (2026)

Repealed, 1966

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Preparation and submission of subdivision plats. History: Repealed 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 172, sec. 91. -- Amended 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 297, sec. 6. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 154, sec. 8. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 3235f-4.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1951–1957 · leading case: Hatch v. Fiscal Court of Fayette Cnty., 242 S.W.2d 1018 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hatch v. Fiscal Court of Fayette Cnty., 242 S.W.2d 1018 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “” KRS 100.360(3) provides as ■ follows: “All plans, maps, regulations, and restrictions adopted by the commission shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive design to promote the public health, safety, morals or general welfare * * *, by securing safety from fire, panic or…”
Am. Sign Corp. v. Fowler, 276 S.W.2d 651 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “” In KRS 100.360(3), also relating to cities of the second class, the objects of zoning are stated so as to include lessening congestion in the streets, providing adequate light and air, preventing overcrowding of land, avoiding the undue concentration of population, and…”
Mathis v. Hannan, 306 S.W.2d 278 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957). “It was enacted under the general power granted by the legislature in Chapter 100 of Kentucky Revised Statutes and was restricted by subsection (3) of KRS 100.360 which provides that all plans and maps adopted by the commission shall be in accordance with a comprehensive design…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.360(3) — 2 cases
Hatch v. Fiscal Court of Fayette Cnty., 242 S.W.2d 1018 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “” KRS 100.360(3) provides as ■ follows: “All plans, maps, regulations, and restrictions adopted by the commission shall be made in accordance with a comprehensive design to promote the public health, safety, morals or general welfare * * *, by securing safety from fire, panic or…”
Am. Sign Corp. v. Fowler, 276 S.W.2d 651 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “” In KRS 100.360(3), also relating to cities of the second class, the objects of zoning are stated so as to include lessening congestion in the streets, providing adequate light and air, preventing overcrowding of land, avoiding the undue concentration of population, and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.