Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 100
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 100.420 (2026)

Repealed, 1966

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Changes in established plans. History: Repealed 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 172, sec. 91. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 154, sec. 12. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 3235f-8.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1949–1991 · leading case: Johnson v. Lagrew, 447 S.W.2d 98 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Johnson v. Lagrew, 447 S.W.2d 98 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 3× “Lindsay Nunn and his wife had been filed under KRS 100.420 while the one by Gilmore N. Nunn was submitted under KRS 100.”
Pierson-Trapp Co. v. Knippenberg, 387 S.W.2d 587 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 2× “In an appropriate proceeding in the circuit court, it was adjudged that the vote did not meet the requirement of KRS 100.420 for a majority vote. Pierson-Trapp Company, applicant for the zone change, appeals and contends that the abstaining votes should have been counted as…”
Shemwell v. Speck, 265 S.W.2d 468 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). “The statute governing zoning in *470 second-class cities, KRS 100.420, authorizes amendments or changes “from time to time” with no requirement of a change of conditions.”
Parker v. Rash, 236 S.W.2d 687 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “ons: (1) the proposed office building is in reality a “hospital,” and therefore its construction would constitute a permissive use of his property within the M-l zoning classification originally established in the general zoning ordinance, and (2) the amendatory ordinance Ivas…”
Parker v. Rash, 236 S.W.2d 687 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). “ntions: (1) the proposed office building is in reality a “hospital,” and therefore its construction would constitute a permissive use of his property within the M-l zoning classification originally established in the general zoning ordinance, and (2) the amendatory ordinance was…”
Boron Oil Co. v. Cathedral Found., Inc., 434 S.W.2d 640 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “KRS 100.420. To bring about uniformity the 1966 General Assembly revised the zoning laws.”
Mathis v. Hannan, 306 S.W.2d 278 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957). “The trial court, in a full and able opinion, pointed out that the comprehensive plan adopted by the city of Paducah could be changed from time to time by the commissioners under the terms of KRS 100.”
Sims v. Bradley, 218 S.W.2d 641 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). · cites it 2× “400, then the procedure outlined in KRS 100.420 would have been necessary, as contended by appellants.”
Hunters Ridge Homeowners Ass'n v. Hicks, 818 S.W.2d 623 (Ky. Ct. App. 1991). “A developer petitioned the city-county planning commission for a zone change. The statutes in effect at that time required that to recommend any zone change, it must be first approved “by a majority vote of the entire members of the commission.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.