Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 119
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 119.050 (2026)

Repealed, 1972

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Qualifications for nomination -- Form of nomination papers. History: Repealed 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 69, effective December 1, 1972. -- Amended 1944 Ky. Acts ch. 86, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 1550-1d, 1550-6, 1550-19.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1945–1974 · leading case: Burke v. Stephenson, 305 S.W.2d 926 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Burke v. Stephenson, 305 S.W.2d 926 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957). “070 originally were enacted, by Chapter 99 of the Acts of 1920, in the form of an amendment to Section 1550-6 of Carroll’s Statutes, which section set forth in detail the requirements for notification and declaration to become a candidate for nomination to any office at a…”
Stovall v. Cook, 512 S.W.2d 487 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974). “071 was enacted the procedure for securing a place on a primary ballot, including the conditions precedent with respect to form, time, and place for the filing of nominating papers, was set forth in KRS 119.050. (This statutory section was superseded in 1972 by KRS 119.”
Mann v. Cornett, 445 S.W.2d 853 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “070, so far as pertinent to the questions at hand, provides: “(1) The provisions of KRS 119.050 do not apply to candidates for judge of the Court of Appeals or to candidates for judge of the circuit court.”
Withrow v. Willis, 447 S.W.2d 627 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 2× “In a primary election, this section must be read in conjunction with KRS 119.050, which is entitled, Qualifications for nomination; form of nomination papers.”
Bach v. Keith, 324 S.W.2d 393 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). · cites it 3× “Vogedes, one of the two persons who on April 18, 1959, signed petitioner’s notification and declaration, was not then a qualified elector as required by KRS 119.050, in that he was not a “legal voter.”
Aubrey v. Oak, 190 S.W.2d 27 (Ky. Ct. App. 1945). “He alleged in his petition that the notification and declaration filed by Oak on July 3, 1945, was void because it failed to contain all the necessary matter set out in KRS 119.”
Brown v. Read, 223 S.W.2d 592 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). “In that action the trial court filed an opinion in which it said: “Sub-section 3, KRS 119.050, provides: 'At the time of filing his notification and declaration, the candidate shall file therewith an affidavit of two reputable electors who are members of the party to which the…”
McDonald v. Revell, 475 S.W.2d 491 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “See KRS 119.050. It was the fact that he could not thus qualify as a Republican, rather than the fact of his defeat in the Democratic primary, that precluded his nomination to fill the vacancy in the Republican candidacy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.