Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 122
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 122.100 (2026)

Repealed, 1974

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Recount of election of officers mentioned in KRS 122.070. History: Repealed 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 130, sec. 198. -- Amended 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 104, sec. 9, effective June 16, 1960. -- Amended 1946 Ky. Acts ch. 151, sec. 5. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 1596a-12.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1943–1974 · leading case: Rives v. Pettit, 513 S.W.2d 475 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rives v. Pettit, 513 S.W.2d 475 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 5× “6 In 2561 he simply demanded a recount under KRS 122.100. In 2562 he demanded that the election commissioners be required to correct their certification and to issue a certificate of election to him.”
Bentley v. Wright, 198 S.W.2d 420 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946). · cites it 2× “We agree that this motion should have been sustained since Section 122.100 KRS requires that a request for a recount of the ballots must be filed within 10 days after the day of election, and that if such request for a recount is included in a petition in a contest proceeding…”
Thieman v. Hancock Etc., 176 S.W.2d 418 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943). · cites it 6× “” KRS 122.100 provides that “any candidate who was voted for at a regular election for any of the offices mentioned in KRS 122.”
Robinson v. Osborne, 314 S.W.2d 681 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). · cites it 3× “On November 13, Robinson filed this action under KRS 122.100 for a recount. After hearing some testimony relative to the integrity of the ballot boxes the judge, reserving a ruling on Osborne’s objection that the integrity of the boxes had not been established, opened the boxes…”
Jackson v. Randolph, 311 S.W.2d 541 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). “” The statute providing for recount proceedings in the circuit court, KRS 122.100, states that a recount may be requested by a candidate for any office to which KRS 122.”
Peyton v. Wells, 217 S.W.2d 305 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). · cites it 2× “Peyton, instituted this action under KRS 122.100 for a recount in an election in Education Division No.”
Adams v. Collins, 255 S.W.2d 500 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). · cites it 4× “The petitions were filed on November 14, 1952, within 10 days after the election as required by KRS 122.100. Due to the absence of the circuit judge from the district, no bond was executed when the petitions were filed.”
Gullett v. Rudd, 299 S.W.2d 611 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957). “Rudd filed suit pursuant to KRS 122.100 for a recount. The result of the recount by the circuit court was 2327 for Gullett and 2362 for Rudd.”
Secrest v. Wellman, 387 S.W.2d 290 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “On November 10, 1964, Secrest filed a recount proceeding pursuant to KRS 122.100. In defense, Miller pleaded that the integrity of the box containing absentee ballots had been violated in the interim since the election.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.