Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 123
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 123.991 (2026)

Repealed, 1974

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Penalties. History: Repealed 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 130, sec. 198; and amended ch. 375, sec. 8. -- Amended 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 81, sec. 10. -- Created 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 216, sec. 13.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1967–1998 · leading case: Democratic Party of Kentucky v. Graham, 976 S.W.2d 423 (Ky. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Democratic Party of Kentucky v. Graham, 976 S.W.2d 423 (Ky. 1998). · cites it 2× “KRS 123.991 (repealed, 1974 Ky.Acts ch. 130, § 198).”
Withrow v. Willis, 447 S.W.2d 627 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 14× “Admittedly he is a registered voter and the violations alleged fall within the scope of KRS 123.991. Subsection (4) of that statute provides: “Any registered voter may sue for in-junctive relief to compel compliance with the provisions of KRS 123.”
Dempsey v. Stovall, 418 S.W.2d 419 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 2× “*421 KRS 123.991 is as follows: “(1) Any person who violates a provision of this act is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding $1,000 or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.”
Stovall v. Cook, 512 S.W.2d 487 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 2× “The penalty provisions of KRS 123.991 cannot reasonably apply to a mere delay in appointing a campaign treasurer in the manner and in the time provided by KRS 123.”
Shepherd v. Johnson, 535 S.W.2d 238 (Ky. 1976). · cites it 2× “On November 8, 1973 Johnson brought this action pursuant to KRS 123.991(2) which provides: “The nomination for, or election to, an office of any candidate who violates any provision of KRS 123.”
Johnson v. Shepherd, 521 S.W.2d 247 (Ky. Ct. App. 1975). “ed a disqualification from holding a Kentucky office that could be removed only by a restoration of citizenship by the Governor of Kentucky; that while Johnson had been restored to citizenship by the Governor of Ohio, this did not restore his citizenship in Kentucky; and that…”
Commonwealth v. Litzelswope, 528 S.W.2d 707 (Ky. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2× “The circuit court dismissed the indictment, relying on KRS 123.991(4) which provides: “Prosecution for violation of any provision of KRS 123.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 123.991(2) — 3 cases
Withrow v. Willis, 447 S.W.2d 627 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “Admittedly he is a registered voter and the violations alleged fall within the scope of KRS 123.991. Subsection (4) of that statute provides: “Any registered voter may sue for in-junctive relief to compel compliance with the provisions of KRS 123.”
Shepherd v. Johnson, 535 S.W.2d 238 (Ky. 1976). “On November 8, 1973 Johnson brought this action pursuant to KRS 123.991(2) which provides: “The nomination for, or election to, an office of any candidate who violates any provision of KRS 123.”
Johnson v. Shepherd, 521 S.W.2d 247 (Ky. Ct. App. 1975). “ed a disqualification from holding a Kentucky office that could be removed only by a restoration of citizenship by the Governor of Kentucky; that while Johnson had been restored to citizenship by the Governor of Ohio, this did not restore his citizenship in Kentucky; and that…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 123.991(4) — 3 cases
Withrow v. Willis, 447 S.W.2d 627 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). “Admittedly he is a registered voter and the violations alleged fall within the scope of KRS 123.991. Subsection (4) of that statute provides: “Any registered voter may sue for in-junctive relief to compel compliance with the provisions of KRS 123.”
Shepherd v. Johnson, 535 S.W.2d 238 (Ky. 1976). “On November 8, 1973 Johnson brought this action pursuant to KRS 123.991(2) which provides: “The nomination for, or election to, an office of any candidate who violates any provision of KRS 123.”
Commonwealth v. Litzelswope, 528 S.W.2d 707 (Ky. Ct. App. 1975). “The circuit court dismissed the indictment, relying on KRS 123.991(4) which provides: “Prosecution for violation of any provision of KRS 123.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.