Catchline at repeal: Sale of tax claims -- Offers of purchase -- Certificate of
delinquency.
History: Repealed 2009 Ky. Acts ch. 10, sec. 71, effective January 1, 2010; and
amended 2009 Ky. Acts ch. 10, sec. 4, effective March 17, 2009. -- Amended 2005
Ky. Acts ch. 85, sec. 274, effective June 20, 2005. -- Amended 2002 Ky. Acts ch.
248, sec. 1, effective April 8, 2002. -- Amended 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 357, sec. 2,
effective July 14, 2000. -- Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 209, sec. 12, effective March
30, 1998. -- Amended 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 391, sec. 4, effective July 14, 1992. --
Amended 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 183, sec. 5, effective July 13, 1990. -- Recodified 1942
Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 4149b-4,
4163.
Notes of Decisions
Flag Drilling Co., Inc. v. Erco, Inc., 156 S.W.3d 762 (Ky. Ct. App. 2005).
“As authorized by KRS 134.450, the Christian County Sheriff offered those delinquent property tax claims for sale to the public.”
Gillis v. Preston, 746 S.W.2d 77 (Ky. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 3× “” KRS 134.450(1). The purchaser is entitled to a certified copy of said certificate.”
United Companies Lending Corp. v. Calvert, 899 S.W.2d 514 (Ky. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 2× “The complaint alleged that “[p]ur-suant to the provisions of KRS 134.450 the delinquent tax claims, which became certificates of delinquency when sold were sold by *515 the sheriff at public auction and purchased for” Johnson County, and that those “[delinquent tax forms…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 134.450(1) — 1 case
Gillis v. Preston, 746 S.W.2d 77 (Ky. Ct. App. 1987).
“” KRS 134.450(1). The purchaser is entitled to a certified copy of said certificate.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 134.450(2) — 1 case
Gillis v. Preston, 746 S.W.2d 77 (Ky. Ct. App. 1987).
“” KRS 134.450(1). The purchaser is entitled to a certified copy of said certificate.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 134.450(3) — 1 case
Gillis v. Preston, 746 S.W.2d 77 (Ky. Ct. App. 1987).
“” KRS 134.450(1). The purchaser is entitled to a certified copy of said certificate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.