Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 150
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 150.110 (2026)

Enforcement of law as to mussels

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The commissioner and game wardens may arrest without warrant anyone violating any of the provisions of KRS 150.520 or any of the rules and regulations made by the department for the protection of mussels under this chapter. They may inspect mussels in any warehouse, boat, store, car, or receptacle when they have good cause to believe that any of the provisions of KRS 150.520 or any of the rules or regulations made thereunder have been or are being violated. This authority does not include the right to enter any dwelling house without a search warrant. When the officers find mussels in the possession of anyone in violation of this chapter, the mussels shall be confiscated and sold in the manner provided by KRS 150.120 for the sale of confiscated wildlife. Effective: July 15, 2024 History: Amended 2024 Ky. Acts ch. 159, sec. 12, effective July 15, 2024. -- Amended 1994 Ky. Acts ch. 413, sec. 2, effective July 15, 1994. -- Amended 1986 Ky. Acts ch. 265, sec. 3, effective July 15, 1986. -- Amended 1978 Ky. Acts ch. 384, sec. 31, effective June 17, 1978. -- Amended 1968 Ky. Acts ch. 38, sec 5 -- Amended 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 255, sec. 144 -- Amended 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 200, sec. 18 -- Amended 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 68, sec 11 -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 1954d-50.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1986–1986 · leading case: Commonwealth Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Collins, 709 S.W.2d 437 (Ky. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Collins, 709 S.W.2d 437 (Ky. 1986). · cites it 2× “"(2) All funds received under KRS 150.110, 150.510 and 150.520 shall be used by the department for the purpose of enforcing those sections and for the protection and propagation of mussel beds.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.