All elections for members of boards of education shall be by secret vote. The county clerk
shall cause to be prepared for presentation to the voters the names of legally eligible
candidates who have filed a petition as provided in KRS 118.315.
Effective: July 13, 1990
History: Repealed and reenacted 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 476, Pt. V, sec. 426, effective July
13, 1990. -- Amended 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 360, sec. 45, effective July 15, 1982. --
Amended 1978 Ky. Acts ch. 384, secs. 46 and 568, effective June 17, 1978. --
Amended 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 188, sec. 65, effective December 1, 1972. -- Amended
1966 Ky. Acts ch. 255, sec. 151 -- Amended 1964 Ky. Acts ch. 83, sec. 1 --
Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat.
sec. 4399-25.
Notes of Decisions
Stewart v. Burks (1964)
kyctapp · cites it 8×
“On the other hand, if certain persons signing both peti-titions may be counted for the petition filed ■first, which was that of appellant Davis, then his petition met the legal requirements.”
Huie v. Jones (1962)
kyctapp · cites it 3×
“KRS 160.220 provides that the nominating petition for a member of a board of education shall be signed by not less than fifty legal voters of the district and that the place of residence of each person signing shall be shown.”
Lakes v. Estridge (1943)
kyctapphigh
“Since appellee had been nominated as a candidate for the office in the manner prescribed by KRS 160.220, K. S. 4399-25, his right to maintain an action to have the election vacated is too well settled to admit of argument.”
Evans v. Hill (1950)
kyctapp · cites it 2×
“His nominating petition was signed by 101 qualified voters of the district and met the requirements of KRS 160.220, and was filed within not less than 45 nor more *62 than 60 days before the day of the election in compliance with KRS 118.”
Smith v. Corum (1948)
kyctapphigh · cites it 2×
“KRS 160.220 requires the county clerk to cause to be-printed on the ballot the names of legally eligible candidates in whose behalf he is petitioned to do so in writing by not less than fifty legal voters of the county school district division.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.