Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 183
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 183.100 (2026)

Compliance with air traffic rules

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No person shall operate any aircraft within the state in any form of navigation whatsoever in violation of the air traffic rules promulgated by the cabinet or the Federal Aviation Administration. For enforcement purposes, cabinet personnel shall have access at all reasonable times to appropriate books, records, and logs of any person operating aircraft in the state. History: Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 308, sec. 5. -- Amended 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 179, sec. 13, effective March 25, 1960. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 153, sec. 10. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 165-53.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case: Delta Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant, Cross v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l, Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Cross-Appellee, 861 F.2d 665 (11th Cir. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant, Cross v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l, Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Cross-Appellee, 861 F.2d 665 (11th Cir. 1989). “§ 3-1001 Kentucky — Ky.Rev.Stat. § 183.100 Louisiana — La.Rev.”
Clarke v. Amazon.Com Servs. LLC (E.D. Ky. 2023). · cites it 14× “1 See KRS 183.100. He notes that overloading the planes jeopardizes the safety of the plane, its cargo, and the pilots in violation of Kentucky Revised Statute (“KRS”) 183.”
Ft. Mitchell Constr., LLC v. Raymond F. Justinic (Ky. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 9× “First, they argue KRS 183.100 is not a sufficient foundation to support a claim of wrongful termination in violation of public policy.”
Dillon v. Eby-Brown Co., LLC (W.D. Ky. 2023). · cites it 3× “KRS 183.100. Id. Upon review, the court found that the plaintiff had sufficiently pled the first constraint of his wrongful discharge claim and, in doing so, rejected the defendant’s argument that the plaintiff had failed to demonstrate an employment-related nexus.”
Oehler v. Eclipse Senior Living, Inc. (E.D. Ky. 2024). “Amazon asserts: While [KRS 183.100] has a safety aim, that aim is to protect the public, not to protect employees from termination.”
Sutherland v. Great Fid. Life Ins. Co., 707 S.W.2d 344 (Ky. 1986). · cites it 2× “The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that any alleged payment was void because it violated KRS 183.100. We reverse. The jury’s determination that a fare was paid sufficiently fulfilled the requirements of the insurance policy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.