Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 196

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 196.700

Definitions for KRS 196.700 to 196.735

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in KRS 196.700 to 196.735, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) "Commission" means the Kentucky State Corrections Commission created in KRS 196.701; (2) "Community corrections program" means a local government agency, private nonprofit, or charitable organization within the judicial circuit which shall perform one (1) or more of the following: (a) Prepare community penalties plans; (b) Directly provide, arrange, or contract with public and private agencies for sentencing services for offenders; and (c) Monitor the progress of offenders placed on community penalty plans or who receive sentencing services through provisions of KRS 196.700 to 196.735; (3) "Community corrections programs plan" means a written plan for the development, implementation, operation, and improvement of a community corrections program; (4) "Community penalties plan" means a plan presented in writing to the sentencing judge which provides a detailed description of and rationale for the targeted offender's proposed sentence to a community corrections program or to one (1) or more special programs, conditions of probation, community punishments, or sanctions in lieu of lengthy incarceration; (5) "Conditions of supervision" means conditions of probation, parole, mandatory reentry supervision, or other form of post-prison supervision; (6) "Judicial circuit" means the circuits prescribed by KRS 23A.020; (7) "Supervised individual" means an individual placed on probation by a court or serving a period of parole or other form of post-release supervision; and (8) "Targeted offenders" means persons charged with or convicted of one (1) or more felonies who under application of law are eligible for probation or suspension of sentence. Effective: June 8, 2011 History: Amended 2011 Ky. Acts ch. 2, sec. 70, effective June 8, 2011. -- Amended 2003 Ky. Acts ch. 71, sec. 7, effective June 24, 2003. -- Created 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 255, sec. 2, effective July 14, 1992.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: James T. Jameson v. Judicial Conduct Commission
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
James T. Jameson v. Judicial Conduct Commission (2024) ky · cites it 13× “The JCC found that Judge Jameson’s purposes in creating the CCB— funding the construction of an SUD treatment center and running a pre-trial ankle monitoring program—were improper under KRS 196.700 to KRS 196.735, the statutes governing community corrections programs and 17…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 196.700(2)(a) — 1 case
James T. Jameson v. Judicial Conduct Commission (2024) ky “The JCC found that Judge Jameson’s purposes in creating the CCB— funding the construction of an SUD treatment center and running a pre-trial ankle monitoring program—were improper under KRS 196.700 to KRS 196.735, the statutes governing community corrections programs and 17…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 196.700(3) — 1 case
James T. Jameson v. Judicial Conduct Commission (2024) ky “The JCC found that Judge Jameson’s purposes in creating the CCB— funding the construction of an SUD treatment center and running a pre-trial ankle monitoring program—were improper under KRS 196.700 to KRS 196.735, the statutes governing community corrections programs and 17…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 196.700(4) — 1 case
James T. Jameson v. Judicial Conduct Commission (2024) ky “The JCC found that Judge Jameson’s purposes in creating the CCB— funding the construction of an SUD treatment center and running a pre-trial ankle monitoring program—were improper under KRS 196.700 to KRS 196.735, the statutes governing community corrections programs and 17…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 196.700(8) — 1 case
James T. Jameson v. Judicial Conduct Commission (2024) ky “The JCC found that Judge Jameson’s purposes in creating the CCB— funding the construction of an SUD treatment center and running a pre-trial ankle monitoring program—were improper under KRS 196.700 to KRS 196.735, the statutes governing community corrections programs and 17…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.