Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 205
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 205.230 (2026)

Repealed, 1964

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Appeals. History: Repealed 1964 Ky. Acts ch. 89, sec. 5. -- Amended 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 173, sec. 1. -- Created 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 110, sec. 9.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1955–1972 · leading case: Barnes v. Turner, 280 S.W.2d 185 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Barnes v. Turner, 280 S.W.2d 185 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). · cites it 4× “230(1,2), which affirmed the ruling of the department, and Turner then appealed' to the circuit court under KRS 205.230(3,. 4). It is- suggested that the motion for an appeal here should be dismissed, because-the statute, KRS 205.”
Ferguson v. Garland, 352 S.W.2d 70 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). · cites it 2× “An applicant who is dissatisfied with the decision on his application for public assistance is provided with an appeal to the appeal board by KRS 205.230(2). An appeal to the circuit court from the decision of the appeal board is provided by KRS 205.”
Ferguson v. Noe, 364 S.W.2d 650 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). · cites it 5× “Appellee failed to appeal from the Appeal Board order discontinuing payments as provided by KRS 205.230, and consequently both appellee and the circuit court were bound by that ruling.”
Powell v. Bailey, 376 S.W.2d 532 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “KRS 205.230. The question is whether the Harlan Circuit Court erred in reversing the Board’s determination that Bailey had ceased to be eligible for aid to dependent children.”
Barnes v. Neal, 287 S.W.2d 419 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). · cites it 3× “Each case was reviewed by the Appeal Board under KRS 205.230(1, 2), which affirmed the ruling of the Department, whereupon ajl three parents appealed to the McCreary Circuit Court under KRS 205.”
Huecker v. Rains, 483 S.W.2d 114 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “The claimant, who was represented by counsel, pursued the administrative appeal provided by KRS 205.230. Upon conflicting medical evidence, the referee found that claimant had failed to establish permanent and total disability.”
Dep't of Econ. Sec., Div. of Pub. Assistance v. Mills, 391 S.W.2d 355 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “KRS 205.230(5) (a) restricts a review in circuit court, in a case such as the one before us, to a determination of whether there was any substantial evidence that supports the finding of the Appeal Board.”
Hogue v. Comm'r of Econ. Sec., 407 S.W.2d 437 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966). “Appeal to the Referee was taken pursuant to KRS 205.230 (now KRS 205.231). On April 15, 1964, the Referee affirmed the decision of the Department and further appeal was taken to the Appeal Board.”
Powell v. Cupp, 375 S.W.2d 399 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “” This decision was upheld by the appeal board following a review provided by KRS 205.230(1, 2). However the Bell Circuit Court reversed the decision, and the Commissioner of Economic Security has taken an appeal to this Court.”
Powell v. Pruitt, 376 S.W.2d 689 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “See KRS 205.230. Appellee has failed to file a brief.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 205.230(2) — 1 case
Ferguson v. Garland, 352 S.W.2d 70 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “An applicant who is dissatisfied with the decision on his application for public assistance is provided with an appeal to the appeal board by KRS 205.230(2). An appeal to the circuit court from the decision of the appeal board is provided by KRS 205.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 205.230(3) — 2 cases
Ferguson v. Garland, 352 S.W.2d 70 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “An applicant who is dissatisfied with the decision on his application for public assistance is provided with an appeal to the appeal board by KRS 205.230(2). An appeal to the circuit court from the decision of the appeal board is provided by KRS 205.”
Ferguson v. Noe, 364 S.W.2d 650 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “Appellee failed to appeal from the Appeal Board order discontinuing payments as provided by KRS 205.230, and consequently both appellee and the circuit court were bound by that ruling.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 205.230(5) — 1 case
Dep't of Econ. Sec., Div. of Pub. Assistance v. Mills, 391 S.W.2d 355 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “KRS 205.230(5) (a) restricts a review in circuit court, in a case such as the one before us, to a determination of whether there was any substantial evidence that supports the finding of the Appeal Board.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.