Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 23
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 23.150 (2026)

Repealed, 1978

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Orders and judgments in vacation or in chambers. History: Repealed 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 491, effective January 2, 1978. -- Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 62, sec. 23. -- Amended 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 84, sec. 45. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 964b-1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1942–1964 · leading case: Elliott v. Commonwealth, 167 S.W.2d 703 (Ky. Ct. App. 1942).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Elliott v. Commonwealth, 167 S.W.2d 703 (Ky. Ct. App. 1942). · cites it 2× “The writ of coram nobis is issued in a summary proceeding, therefore it was entirely proper for the judge before whom the application for the writ was made to conduct the hearing in a county in his judicial district other than the one in which the petition was filed.”
McIntosh v. Commonwealth, 368 S.W.2d 331 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “However, KRS 23.150 specifically authorized the court “to make or direct in vacation or term time at his chambers, at the circuit clerk’s office or at any other place in any county in the district, any order, rule, or judgment in any proceeding on the criminal docket, upon…”
Blankenship v. Staton, 348 S.W.2d 925 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). “* * Substantially these same provisions had been theretofore enacted in 1948 by KRS 23.150. In 1952 this statute was amended to apply only to criminal cases to eliminate the unnecessary duplication of CR 6.”
Wharton v. Cole, 374 S.W.2d 498 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “Neither KRS 23.150 nor CR 6.03(2), cited by appellee, justifies the action taken.”
Gross' Adm'x v. Couch, 166 S.W.2d 879 (Ky. Ct. App. 1942). “That case was decided in 1911, which was some time before the enactment of the statute, now published as KRS 23.150 (Sec. 964b-l, Ky. Stats.), authorizing the making *307 of an order or judgment anywhere in the judicial district of which the county where the case is pending is a…”
Cook v. Chitwood, 190 S.W.2d 551 (Ky. Ct. App. 1945). · cites it 2× “The judgment was rendered on January 24, 1945, approximately a month after the close of the December, 1944, term, without the notice to the parties required by section 23.150 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, which reads: “The judge of each circuit court, other than those of…”
Stearns Coal & Lumber Co. v. Roberts, 168 S.W.2d 573 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943). · cites it 2× “KRS 23.150 (Carroll’s Kentucky Statutes, section .”
Jackson v. Jackson, 179 S.W.2d 197 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944). · cites it 3× “The opinion discloses, however, that the case in which the judgment was rendered in vacation had been submitted by agreement and tried on its merits; thus the procedure was in conformity with the Practice Act of the Civil Code as supplemented by the Act of 1930, formerly KS…”
Carter v. Templeman, 182 S.W.2d 241 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944). · cites it 2× “as amended by the General Assembly in the year 1930, is compiled in KRS 23.150, a bill of exceptions could not be signed or made part of the record by the judge in vacation although an order be entered purporting to allow it to be done, unless such order was entered of record by…”
Palmer v. Palmer, 174 S.W.2d 711 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943). “On September 27, 1942, a supplemental judgment was rendered, explaining the former judgment and modifying-it adversely to the appellant to the extent of $600.”
Ragland v. Baxter, 177 S.W.2d 579 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944). “150, for it does not appear that any objection was made to the tiine or place, the attorney for the grandparents objecting to the judgment drawn'by the plaintiff’s counsel only because the father of the child was in the army. Of course, the Judge did not have to enter that…”
Gruber v. Holbert, Judge, 225 S.W.2d 660 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). · cites it 3× “Gruber in accordance with the provisions of KRS 23.150; and further, because of the actions taken by him on the attachment.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.