Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 243
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 243.370 (2026)

Repealed, 2017

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Local administrator to approve application first. History: Repealed 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 62, sec. 119, effective June 29, 2017. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 2554b-110, 2554b-111, 2554b-139.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1946–2014 · leading case: Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Klein, 192 S.W.2d 735 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Klein, 192 S.W.2d 735 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946). “Keown, Distilled Spirits Administrator of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board of the State of Kentucky, as required by sections 243.370 and 243.380 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, for approval of the application and issuance of a state license.”
Haggard v. City of Dayton, 508 S.W.2d 590 (Ky. Ct. App. 1974). “His application for renewal of his city licenses was approved by the city alcoholic beverage control administrator and on the basis of that approval his state licenses were renewed in accordance with KRS 243.370. However, on June 29 Haggard received the following letter from the…”
Reinsperg v. Reed, 233 S.W.2d 412 (Ky. Ct. App. 1950). “” We believe the lease substantially complies, with the statutory requirement for the fiscal year 1948-49! Appellee maintains that the Board did not have the statutory right to review this case where the license has been denied by the City Administrator, because KRS 243.370…”
Krenitz v. Baron, 252 S.W.2d 58 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). “Bartholomew for his approval or disapproval. When the appeal was called for hearing on the following day, the record disclosed that Krenitz’ application had been approved by Bartholomew.”
Moberly v. Thompson, 404 S.W.2d 277 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966). “For appellants it is first insisted that ap-pellee did not secure and indicate on his application the approval of the city administrator as KRS 243.370 requires. The application was filed March 2, 1965.”
K. Whiskey Store, Inc. v. Shearer, 276 S.W.2d 457 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “But KRS 243.370 provides one is ineligible to apply for such state license to sell intoxicating liquor in a town or county until he has been approved by the Local Administrator.”
O'Sullivan v. Portwood, 309 S.W.2d 773 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). “” The applications for the licenses in question were approved by the local administrator as required by KRS 243.370. When the applications were filed with the A.”
Palmer-Ball v. Esquire Liquors, Inc., 490 S.W.2d 472 (Ky. Ct. App. 1973). “KRS 243.370 requires that the application be first approved by the county administrator before filing with the Board.”
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Hon David A. Tapp Judge, Pulaski Circuit Court (Ky. 2014). “In Somerset's estimation, the Department arbitrarily enforced regulations concerning license allotments and, by approving applications for state licenses before the city administrator approved applications, violated KRS 243.370. The Department responded by moving to dismiss…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.