Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 243
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 243.570 (2026)

Repealed, 1996

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Procedure on appeal. History: Repealed 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 318, sec. 357, effective July 15, 1996. -- Amended 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 94, sec. 6. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2554b-147.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases, 1944–1972 · leading case: Am. Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 379 S.W.2d 450 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Am. Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 379 S.W.2d 450 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “KRS 243.570(2). 16 . When no direct appeal is authorized by the legislature, resort to other procedural remedies may be required to obtain a review of administrative action.”
Kentucky State Racing Comm'n v. Fuller, 481 S.W.2d 298 (Ky. Ct. App. 1972). “KRS 243.570. Any party “aggrieved” by a judgment of the Franklin Circuit Court is granted an appeal to the Court of Appeals in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure.”
O'Brien v. Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 206 S.W.2d 941 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947). “Appellees insist that since the Board’s finding was pursuant to the provisions of KRS 243.570, the review by the Circuit Court is limited to the following: Whether or not (a) the Board acted without or in exeess of its powers; (b) the order appealed from was procured by fraud;…”
Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Woosley, 367 S.W.2d 127 (Ky. Ct. App. 1963). “(See KRS 243.570) This ruling denied the right of the state administrator (or Board) to reject an application except upon some specific ground of disqualification prescribed by statute or an authorized regulation promulgated thereunder.”
Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Hall, 180 S.W.2d 293 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944). · cites it 2× “Such was the conclusion of the judge of the Franklin circuit court, the authority of which is limited by subsection (2) of section 243.570 of KBS in this language: “* * * Its (circuit court) review shall be limited to determining whether or not: ' .”
Moberly v. King, 355 S.W.2d 309 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962). “KRS 243.570 prescribes a limited review-in the circuit court from an order of the-Board.”
Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Coghill, 273 S.W.2d 570 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). “In KRS 243.570 there is set out the procedure on appeal to the Franklin Circuit Court from the Board’s finding.”
Jacobs v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 299 S.W.2d 613 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957). “KRS 243.570 (2) (c). The alleged improper acts were: (1) Permitting the licensed premises to be disorderly, in violation of KRS 244.”
Webb v. Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 291 S.W.2d 558 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “Under KRS 243.570, the court in reviewing an order of the Board is limited to determining: (1) whether the Board acted without or in excess of its powers; (2)whether the order appealed from was procured by fraud; and (3) if questions of fact are in issue, whether or not any…”
Kenton Distrib. Co. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 181 S.W.2d 64 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944). · cites it 2× “Section 243.570 provides that on appeal from a ruling of the Board the courts are limited to determination as whether or not (a) “The board acted without or in excess of its power; * * * (c) if questions of fact are at issue whether or not any substantial evidence supports the…”
Dunbar v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 216 S.W.2d 42 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). “” KRS 243.570 provides that no new or additional evidence shall be introduced in the Franklin Circuit Court except for certain fraud and misconduct, and the Court is directed to hear the case upon the record made before the Board.”
Shearer v. Bulleit, 257 S.W.2d 903 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “See KRS 243.570 (2) (c). We must therefore examine the facts in order to decide if appellee caused, suffered or permitted disorderliness upon the licensed premises in violation of KRS 244.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 243.570(2) — 5 cases
Am. Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 379 S.W.2d 450 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “KRS 243.570(2). 16 . When no direct appeal is authorized by the legislature, resort to other procedural remedies may be required to obtain a review of administrative action.”
Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Helm Hotel Cocktail Lounge, Inc., 357 S.W.2d 891 (Ky. Ct. App. 1962).
Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Baker, 287 S.W.2d 605 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).
J. & J. Liquor Store, Inc. v. Dep't of Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 307 S.W.2d 760 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).
Brey v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 451 S.W.2d 647 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.