Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 247.401 (2026)

Legislative findings for KRS 247.401 to 247.4029

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Assembly finds that activities involving the use and exhibition of farm animals are engaged in by a large number of citizens of Kentucky and that these activities also attract to Kentucky a large number of nonresidents, significantly contributing to the economy of Kentucky. Since it is recognized that there are inherent risks in working with, exhibiting, and using farm animals which should be understood by participants in farm animal activities and which are essentially impossible for owners of farm animals or sponsors of farm animal activities to eliminate, it is the purpose of KRS 247.401 to 247.4029 to define the areas of responsibility and affirmative acts for which activity sponsors, professionals, and participants shall be responsible, to specify risks of injury for which activity sponsors, professionals, and participants shall not be responsible, and to specify areas of responsibilities of farm animal participants. Therefore, the General Assembly determines that to preserve and promote the long Kentucky tradition of activities involving farm animals and the health and safety of the citizens of Kentucky and visitors to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, KRS 247.401 to 247.4029 are necessary to instruct persons voluntarily engaging in farm animal activities of the potential risks inherent in the activities. Effective: July 15, 1996 History: Created 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 78, sec. 1, effective July 15, 1996.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2021–2024 · leading case: Keeneland Ass'n, Inc. v. Roy J. Prather (Ky. 2021).
Keeneland Ass'n, Inc. v. Roy J. Prather (Ky. 2021). · cites it 3× “” KRS 247.401. In enacting the FAAA the legislature recognized the widespread occurrence of farm animal activities in Kentucky and the economic benefits such activities bring to the state.”
Joi Denise Roby v. Churchill Downs, Inc. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 3× “To reiterate for purposes of clarity: KRS 247.401 to 247.4029 shall not apply to farm animal activity sponsors, farm animal activity professionals, persons, or participants when engaged in horse racing activities.”
Joi Denise Roby v. Churchill Downs, Inc. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 3× “To reiterate for purposes of clarity: KRS 247.401 to 247.4029 shall not apply to farm animal activity sponsors, farm animal activity professionals, persons, or participants when engaged in horse racing activities.”
Joi Denise Roby v. Churchill Downs, Inc. (Ky. 2024). “KRS 247.401. To accomplish that goal the legislature established that, “persons do not have a duty to eliminate risks inherent in farm animal activities which are beyond their immediate control if those risks are or should be reasonably obvious, expected or necessary to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.