Catchline at repeal: Establishment of boundaries -- Election precinct line not to be
crossed -- Exceptions to report.
History: Repealed 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 491, effective January
2, 1978. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from
Ky. Stat. sec. 1080, 1081.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 1952–1977 · leading case:
Duncan v. McMurray, 249 S.W.2d 156 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952).
Duncan v. McMurray, 249 S.W.2d 156 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952).
“It is argued that the election was void because of a violation of KRS 25.700 which provides that in establishing or reapportioning the boundaries of magisterial districts by a county court, no boundary “shall cross the boundary line of an election precinct.”
East v. Bell, 557 S.W.2d 424 (Ky. Ct. App. 1977).
· cites it 2× “However, under KRS 25.700 “(t)he commissioners shall within twenty (20) days after their appointment lay off the boundary line of the districts” which might suggest that the commissioners could be appointed and the notice given concurrently.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.