Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 271B.8-420 (2026)

Standards of conduct for officers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) An officer with discretionary authority shall discharge his duties under that authority:

(a) In good faith;

(b) On an informed basis; and

(c) In a manner he honestly believes to be in the best interests of the corporation.

(2) An officer shall be considered to discharge his duties on an informed basis if he makes, with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances, inquiry into the business and affairs of the corporation, or into a particular action to be taken or decision to be made.

(3) In discharging his duties an officer shall be entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including financial statements and other financial data, if prepared or presented by:

(a) One (1) or more officers or employees of the corporation whom the officer honestly believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented; or

(b) Legal counsel, public accountants, or other persons as to matters the officer honestly believes are within the person's professional or expert competence.

(4) An officer shall not be considered to be acting in good faith if he has knowledge concerning the matter in question that makes reliance otherwise permitted by subsection (3) of this section unwarranted.

(5) Any action taken as an officer, or any failure to take any action as an officer, shall not be the basis for monetary damages or injunctive relief unless:

(a) The officer has breached or failed to perform his duties in compliance with this section; and

(b) In the case of an action for monetary damages, the breach or failure to perform constitutes willful misconduct or wanton or reckless disregard for the best interests of the corporation or its shareholders.

(6) A person bringing an action or monetary damages under this section shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence the provisions of subsection (5)(a) and (b) of this section, and the burden of proving that the breach or failure to perform was the legal cause of damages suffered by the corporation.

(7) Nothing in this section shall eliminate or limit the liability of any officer for any act or omission occurring prior to July 15, 1988. Effective: July 15, 1988 History: Created 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 23, sec. 91, effective January 1, 1989 and ch. 224, sec. 10, effective July 15, 1988. Formerly codified as KRS 271A.257.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2023 · leading case: Flegles, Inc. v. Truserv Corp., 289 S.W.3d 544 (Ky. 2009).
Flegles, Inc. v. Truserv Corp., 289 S.W.3d 544 (Ky. 2009). · cites it 2× “TruServ's directors and officers may well have owed fiduciary duties to the corporation and to its shareholders, TruServ Corporation v.”
Griffin v. Jones, 170 F. Supp. 3d 956 (W.D. Ky. 2016). · cites it 2× “In 2008, Bain sold his 50% stake in ICS to Griffin for $2 million. (DN 18). Griffin is a stockholder in ICS but has never been an officer or director of ICS.”
Brown Jordan Int'l, Inc. v. Christopher Carmicle, 846 F.3d 1167 (11th Cir. 2017). “Ky. Rev. Stat. § 271B.8-420(1). Carmicle contends this statute shows he had fiduciary duties to Brown Jordan, and acting or failing to act otherwise than in good faith in the discharge of his duties could have subjected him to liability.”
Baptist Physicians Lexington, Inc. v. New Lexington Clinic, P.S.C., 436 S.W.3d 189 (Ky. 2013). “Neither of the above-cited cases involves actions taken as a director or officer or failures to take action as a director or officer.”
Gross v. Adcomm, Inc., 478 S.W.3d 396 (Ky. Ct. App. 2015). “8-310 (concerning conflicts of interest); and KRS 271B.8-420 (concerning conduct of corporate officers).”
2815 Grand Realty Corp. v. Goose Creek Energy, Inc., 656 F. Supp. 2d 707 (E.D. Ky. 2009). “8-300 and KRS 271B.8-420, Kentucky state statutes setting out the standards for corporate officers and directors.”
Brewer v. Lincoln Int'l Corp., 148 F. Supp. 2d 792 (W.D. Ky. 2000). · cites it 3× “8-300, -420 Count III of the plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint alleges that Sisney, as an officer of LINCO, violated KRS § 271B.8-420. Count IV of the plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint alleges violations of KRS § 271B.”
Shan Wolfe v. Joe Kimmel (Ky. 2023). “§ 271B.8-420.” The letter stated that if Wolfe did not cease Legacy’s operations, return all clients to GenCare, and give all of Legacy’s profits to GenCare, GenCare would sue Wolfe and Legacy for tortious interference with contract and prospective contract.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 271B.8-420(1) — 2 cases
Brown Jordan Int'l, Inc. v. Christopher Carmicle, 846 F.3d 1167 (11th Cir. 2017). “Ky. Rev. Stat. § 271B.8-420(1). Carmicle contends this statute shows he had fiduciary duties to Brown Jordan, and acting or failing to act otherwise than in good faith in the discharge of his duties could have subjected him to liability.”
Brewer v. Lincoln Int'l Corp., 148 F. Supp. 2d 792 (W.D. Ky. 2000). “8-300, -420 Count III of the plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint alleges that Sisney, as an officer of LINCO, violated KRS § 271B.8-420. Count IV of the plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint alleges violations of KRS § 271B.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 271B.8-420(6) — 1 case
Baptist Physicians Lexington, Inc. v. New Lexington Clinic, P.S.C., 436 S.W.3d 189 (Ky. 2013). “Neither of the above-cited cases involves actions taken as a director or officer or failures to take action as a director or officer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.