Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 281
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.410 (2026)

Repealed, 1950

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Right of appeal; how taken. History: Repealed 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 57, effective June 15, 1950. -- Amended 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 185, sec. 1. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 2739j-72, 2739j-86, 2739j-89.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1944–1955 · leading case: Middleton's Adm'x v. Middleton, 179 S.W.2d 227 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Middleton's Adm'x v. Middleton, 179 S.W.2d 227 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944). · cites it 2× “We have for construction in regard to timely procedure KRS 281.410(2) relating to an appeal to the Franklin Circuit Court from a decision or order of the Division of Motor Transportation with respect to common carriers.”
Short Way Lines, Inc. v. Black, 182 S.W.2d 17 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944). · cites it 2× “In the manner provided by KRS 281.410, SWL appealed to the Franklin Circuit Court from the order of the Director granting Black any certificate; also, from the order placing limitations on the certificate granted it.”
Becker v. Yeary, 278 S.W.2d 632 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). · cites it 3× “A significant part of KRS 281.410, in ■force at the time, reads: “(1) An appeal may be taken to the Franklin circuit court from the action of the division in the following cases .”
Phillips v. Se. Greyhound Lines, 208 S.W.2d 43 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947). “Should the Division abuse its discretion in altering or amending, or in refusing to alter or amend, a certificate, the aggrieved party may appeal to the Franklin Circuit Court, and thence to this Court, as provided by KRS 281.”
Eck Miller Transfer Co. v. Armes, 252 S.W.2d 13 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). · cites it 5× “the General Assembly revised the appeals provision of the statute, KRS 281.410 (1948 Edition), to read as it is now worded in KRS 281.”
Utter v. Black, 202 S.W.2d 425 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947). “SWL appealed to the Franklin Circuit Court in the manner provided in KRS 281.410. That court upheld the Director in refusing to cancel Black’s certificate 274 and in removing the restrictions therefrom.”
Hazard-Hyden Bus Co. v. Black, 192 S.W.2d 195 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946). “(hereinafter referred to as HH), brought this action under KRS 281.410 in the Franklin Circuit Court against Black and seven other applicants for the certificate, asking that the award of the Director be set aside because he ■exceeded his authority.”
Yeary v. Union Transfer & Storage Co., 209 S.W.2d 77 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). “There is no merit in Yeary’s contention that the circuit court granted more relief than was asked by Union. The protest filed by Union requested the Director to require Yeary to comply with his certificate.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.410(2) — 1 case
Middleton's Adm'x v. Middleton, 179 S.W.2d 227 (Ky. Ct. App. 1944). “We have for construction in regard to timely procedure KRS 281.410(2) relating to an appeal to the Franklin Circuit Court from a decision or order of the Division of Motor Transportation with respect to common carriers.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.410(3) — 1 case
Eck Miller Transfer Co. v. Armes, 252 S.W.2d 13 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). “the General Assembly revised the appeals provision of the statute, KRS 281.410 (1948 Edition), to read as it is now worded in KRS 281.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 281.410(d) — 1 case
Yeary v. Union Transfer & Storage Co., 209 S.W.2d 77 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). “There is no merit in Yeary’s contention that the circuit court granted more relief than was asked by Union. The protest filed by Union requested the Director to require Yeary to comply with his certificate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.