Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 29.020 (2026)

Repealed, 1954

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Petit juries; number of jurors; qualifications. History: Repealed 1954 Ky. Acts ch. 7, sec. 28. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2252, 2253.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1947–2012 · leading case: Sluss v. Commonwealth, 381 S.W.3d 215 (Ky. 2012).
Sluss v. Commonwealth, 381 S.W.3d 215 (Ky. 2012). “2d 741, 743 (1949) ("This statute [now-repealed KRS 29.020(2) ] makes it necessary for a party to inform himself as to the qualifications of jurors before the jury is sworn in order that he may exercise his right of challenge, general or peremptory, but the statute does not…”
Johnson v. Commonwealth, 223 S.W.2d 741 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). · cites it 2× “” Subsection 2 of Section 29.020, KRS, prescribes the qualifications of jurors, and subsection 3 provides: 44The fact that a person not qualified served on a jury shall not be cause for setting the verdict aside, nor shall ex *186 ceptions be taken to any juror for lack of…”
Rice v. Commonwealth, 387 S.W.2d 4 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “See also KRS 29.020(2). In Lee v. Commonwealth, 210 Ky.”
Cincinnati, N. & C. Ry. Co. v. Tenkotte's Ex'r, 205 S.W.2d 503 (Ky. Ct. App. 1947). “The appellant points out that a challenge of a juror for cause must be made before trial and not later (KRS 29.020; Croley v. Owens, 296 Ky. 51 , 176 S.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 29.020(2) — 2 cases
Sluss v. Commonwealth, 381 S.W.3d 215 (Ky. 2012). “2d 741, 743 (1949) ("This statute [now-repealed KRS 29.020(2) ] makes it necessary for a party to inform himself as to the qualifications of jurors before the jury is sworn in order that he may exercise his right of challenge, general or peremptory, but the statute does not…”
Rice v. Commonwealth, 387 S.W.2d 4 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “See also KRS 29.020(2). In Lee v. Commonwealth, 210 Ky.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.