Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 29.330 (2026)

Repealed, 1978

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Three-fourths verdict in circuit court. History: Repealed 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 491, effective January 2, 1978. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2268.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1943–1970 · leading case: Naumburg v. Wagner, 465 P.2d 521 (N.M. Ct. App. 1970).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Naumburg v. Wagner, 465 P.2d 521 (N.M. Ct. App. 1970). “Opposite results have been reached in other jurisdictions. California, Kentucky, Ohio, Oregon, and Wisconsin were faced with this identical question.”

Whitcomb v. Whitcomb, 267 S.W.2d 400 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). “The verdict was concurred in by only 10 of the jurors and therefore, under KRS 29.330, was required to be signed by the individual jurors who agreed to it.”

Baxter v. Tankersley, 416 S.W.2d 737 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967). “Appellant relies upon Section 248 of the Constitution, KRS 29.330, and CR 48, all of which require a less than unanimous verdict to be signed by all of the jurors who agree with the verdict.”

Commonwealth v. McKee, 170 S.W.2d 340 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943). “KRS 29.330. Appellant takes the position that the proceeding is-controlled by Section 392 of the Criminal Code of Practice which provides that the Commonwealth may proceed, by action in the name of the Commonwealth against the-defendant and his surety, upon a breach of the bond.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.