Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 304.39-090 (2026)

Required security

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An owner of a motor vehicle registered in this Commonwealth who ceases to maintain security as required by the provisions on security may not operate or permit operation of the vehicle in this Commonwealth until security has again been provided as required by this subtitle. An owner who fails to maintain security as required by this subtitle shall have his or her motor vehicle registration revoked in accordance with KRS 186A.040. All other owners shall provide such security while operating a motor vehicle in this Commonwealth. Effective: July 15, 1998 History: Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 442, sec. 4, effective July 15, 1998. -- Amended 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 341, sec. 8, effective July 15, 1996. -- Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 385, sec. 9, effective July 1, 1975.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: Progressive N. Ins. Co. v. Corder, 15 S.W.3d 381 (Ky. 2000).
Progressive N. Ins. Co. v. Corder, 15 S.W.3d 381 (Ky. 2000). · cites it 2× “KRS 304.39-090 prohibits a motor vehicle owner who ceases to maintain security from operating or permitting the vehicle to be operated in Kentucky.”
Samons v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 399 S.W.3d 425 (Ky. 2013). “39- *428 060, limitation of tort rights; and KRS 304.39-090, required insurance coverage.”
Nat'l Ins. Ass'n v. Peach, 926 S.W.2d 859 (Ky. Ct. App. 1996). “KRS 304.39-090 prohibits an owner of a motor vehicle who ceases to maintain security from operating or permitting the operation of the vehicle in the Commonwealth.”
Calhoun v. Provence, 395 S.W.3d 476 (Ky. Ct. App. 2012). “And finally, Legend Suzuki argues that under KRS 304.39-090, upon acceptance Yaden’s Auto Sales had the obligation to insure the vehicle as a matter of law.”
Guar. Nat'l Ins. v. Cain, 851 F. Supp. 265 (E.D. Ky. 1994). “at §§ 304.39-090, - 110; see id. at § 304.39-020(17).”
United States v. John Lawson (6th Cir. 2022). “Ky. Rev. Stat §§ 304.39-090, 186A.065. In this case, Salyer’s sole basis for initiating the stop was an AVIS response indicating that the Suburban’s insurance should be verified.”
McNally v. Tabor (E.D. Ky. 2019). “Kentucky law requires car owners and operators to maintain adequate car insurance, KRS 304.39-090, and the failure to do so may be punished by up to ninety days’ imprisonment, KRS 304.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.