All employers who employ ten (10) or more and pay their employees by check or
otherwise, making deductions from the salaries and wages due said employees,
shall state specifically the amount for which the deductions are made, and each
such employer at the time of payment of salary or wage to each employee shall
furnish the employee a paper or electronic statement giving the amount of each
deduction and the general purpose for which the deduction is made. If an employer
provides an electronic statement, then the employer shall provide access to a
computer and printer for review and printing by the employee.
Effective:June 29, 2017
History: Amended 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 134, sec. 5, effective June 29, 2017. --
Created 1944 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case:
Noel v. Season-Sash, Inc., 722 S.W.2d 901 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986).
Noel v. Season-Sash, Inc., 722 S.W.2d 901 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 2× “065), that an employer must provide a wage statement and rest periods (KRS 337.070 and 337.365), and that a minimum wage must be paid (KRS 337.”
Southard v. Newcomb Oil Co., LLC (W.D. Ky. 2020).
· cites it 2× “060 (Count IV), failure to furnish statement of wage deductions under KRS § 337.070 (Count V), and unjust enrichment (Count VI).”
Southard v. Newcomb Oil Co., LLC (W.D. Ky. 2024).
· cites it 2× “060; (4) failure to furnish accurate statements of wage deductions under Ky. Rev. Stat. § 337.070; and (5) unjust enrichment.”
CellMark, Inc. v. Robert Webster, et al. (E.D. Ky. 2026).
· cites it 2× “” And Section 337.070 states that employers: making deductions from the salaries and wages due said employees, shall state specifically the amount for which the deductions are made, and each such employer at the time of payment of salary or wage to each employee shall furnish…”
Constance Mouanda v. Jani-King Int'l (Ky. Ct. App. 2021).
“275 nor was she given information about hours worked in violation of KRS 337.070. She was not paid what she had bargained for.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.