Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 337
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 337.510 (2026)

Repealed, 2017

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Public authority's duties as to inclusion of prevailing wage in proposals and contracts. History: Repealed 2017 Ky. Acts ch. 3, sec. 14, effective January 9, 2017. -- Amended 2010 Ky. Acts ch. 24, sec. 1741, effective July 15, 2010. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 341, sec. 3. -- Amended 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 33, sec. 3. -- Amended 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 56, sec. 1, effective June 16, 1960. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2290c-2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1949–2014 · leading case: TECO Mech. Contractor, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 366 S.W.3d 386 (Ky. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
TECO Mech. Contractor, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 366 S.W.3d 386 (Ky. 2012). · cites it 3× “KRS 337.510(1). After the Cabinet provides it with a prevailing wage schedule, the public authority must incorporate the schedule into its bid documents and project specifications so that contractors bidding on the project are aware of the wage rates and may properly estimate…”
Baughn v. Gorrell Riley, 224 S.W.2d 436 (Ky. Ct. App. 1949). · cites it 3× “The controversy arose because the Board had failed to comply with KRS 337.510, which directs it to ascertain prevailing rates of wages before advertising for public construction bids, and requires it to make a part of the specifications for the work a schedule of wages based on…”
Cassady v. Bd. of Aldermen, 277 S.W.2d 1 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). · cites it 5× “The lower court held that the City had the right to do the construction as it had ordained, and that it was not *2 violating KRS 337.510 and 337.520. This appeal followed.”
TECO Mech. Contractor, Inc. v. Kentucky Labor Cabinet, 474 S.W.3d 153 (Ky. Ct. App. 2014). “1 KRS 337.510(1). In 2001, several TECO employees contacted the Kentucky Labor Cabinet and alleged that TECO had failed to pay them the prevailing wages for the work that they had performed.”
Kerth v. Hopkins Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 346 S.W.2d 737 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). · cites it 3× “The Board was requested to establish prevailing rates of wages for the construction work under the provisions of KRS 337.510. This statute requires every “public authority” (which includes the Board of Education) to “ascertain” from the Department of Industrial Relations “the…”
Hardin Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Land, 645 S.W.2d 711 (Ky. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “in writing that in its opinion the non-profit corporation was a public authority and was not complying with KRS 337.510. Hardin Memorial Hospital, Inc.”
Cabe v. City of Campbellsville, 385 S.W.2d 51 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). “Such action was as then authorized by KRS 337.510. At the initial hearing evidence was presented in behalf of appellees that there had been no change in the rate of wages in the area since the adoption of the schedule.”
Bd. of Educ. of Campbellsville Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Faulkner, 433 S.W.2d 853 (Ky. Ct. App. 1968). “As required by KRS 337.510, the appellant school board included in its specifications pertaining to the construction project a schedule of prevailing wages.”
Carpenters Local No. 1650 v. City of Lexington, 248 S.W.2d 407 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). “We held that the statute, in requiring that the rates fixed in collective bargaining agreements between labor organizations and employers be established as the prevailing wages if such agreements apply to a sufficient number of employes “to furnish a reasonable basis for…”
Allen Co. v. Eden, 267 S.W.2d 714 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). · cites it 2× “The Allen Company has moved for an appeal from a judgment awarding Enoyce Eden $937 for the difference between wages paid him by the Allen Company during 1949 and 1950, and wages which he claimed should 'have been paid him by reason of KRS 337.510 and KRS 337.550. - We are…”
Lwellyn v. Harmon, 285 S.W.2d 150 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955). “Carl Lwellyn and Beckham Williamson brought, actions against their former employer, John Harmon, to recover the difference betweqn the wages actually paid to them and the minimum wages claimed to be due in accordance with KRS 337.510 to 337.550, for work on three public road…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 337.510(1) — 2 cases
TECO Mech. Contractor, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 366 S.W.3d 386 (Ky. 2012). “KRS 337.510(1). After the Cabinet provides it with a prevailing wage schedule, the public authority must incorporate the schedule into its bid documents and project specifications so that contractors bidding on the project are aware of the wage rates and may properly estimate…”
TECO Mech. Contractor, Inc. v. Kentucky Labor Cabinet, 474 S.W.3d 153 (Ky. Ct. App. 2014). “1 KRS 337.510(1). In 2001, several TECO employees contacted the Kentucky Labor Cabinet and alleged that TECO had failed to pay them the prevailing wages for the work that they had performed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.