Kentucky Revised Statutes
Ky. Rev. Stat. § 342.615 (2026)
Repealed, 2022
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Catchline at repeal: Registration of employee leasing companies -- Coverage requirements for lessees -- Status of temporary help service. History: Repealed 2022 Ky. Acts ch. 50, sec. 14, effective July 14, 2022. -- Amended 2010 Ky. Acts ch. 24, sec. 1836, effective July 15, 2010. -- Created 1996 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 1, sec. 36, effective December 12, 1996.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2005–2022 · leading case: Brown v. Indiana Ins. Co., 184 S.W.3d 528 (Ky. 2005).
Brown v. Indiana Ins. Co., 184 S.W.3d 528 (Ky. 2005). “Specifically, KRS 342.615 provides: 342.615. Registration of employee leasing companiesCoverage requirements for lessees Status of temporary help service.”
Kentucky Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Hoskins, 449 S.W.3d 753 (Ky. 2014). “This is a workers’ compensation appeal in which we address for the first time the relationship between the common law loaned servant doctrine and the employee leasing arrangements that are the subject of KRS 342.615. Appellant, Uninsured Employers’ Fund (UEF), appeals from a…”
Labor Ready, Inc. v. Johnston, 289 S.W.3d 200 (Ky. 2009). “700, and KRS 342.615. Known commonly as the "exclusive remedy" provision, KRS 342.”
Gen. Agents Ins. Co. of Am. v. Mandrill Corp., 243 F. App'x 961 (6th Cir. 2007). “, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 342.615 (2006). The CGL Policy’s definition of employee, therefore, is designed to reflect this distinction as it exists in some states.”
Jse, Inc., D/B/A Perma Staff II v. Patricia Ahart (Ky. 2021). “By way of background, KRS 342.615, codified in 1996, establishes the framework for employee leasing.”
Kristian Collins v. Miami Valley Paper Tube Co. (Ky. Ct. App. 2022). “Collins argues the holding of Technical Minerals does not apply because the General Assembly enacted KRS 342.615 approximately one month after that case was decided.”
Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Julian Hoskins (Ky. 2017). “We concluded from the evidence, as· did the administrative law judge (AW), that the parties were not engaged in a loaned servant situation, but were instead participating in, or purporting to participate in, an employee· leasing arrangement subject to KRS 342.615. Thus, we…”
Kentucky Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Hoskins, 440 S.W.3d 370 (Ky. 2013). “Key to that determination was the fact that Better Integrated and Beacon failed to comply with the reporting requirements of KRS 342.615 and 803 KAR 25:230 which would have put KEMI on notice that they were leasing employees to Four Star.”
Lafayette Ins. Co. v. Jerry S. Roberts (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 342.615 (2006). The CGL Policy's definition of employee, therefore, is designed to reflect this distinction as it exists in some states.”
Nathaniel Edward Maysey v. Express Servs., Inc. (Ky. 2021). “As for a temporary staffing company, KRS 342.615(5) states that “[a] temporary help service shall be deemed the employer of a temporary worker and shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 342.615(1) — 2 cases
Labor Ready, Inc. v. Johnston, 289 S.W.3d 200 (Ky. 2009). “700, and KRS 342.615. Known commonly as the "exclusive remedy" provision, KRS 342.”
Kentucky Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Hoskins, 449 S.W.3d 753 (Ky. 2014). “This is a workers’ compensation appeal in which we address for the first time the relationship between the common law loaned servant doctrine and the employee leasing arrangements that are the subject of KRS 342.615. Appellant, Uninsured Employers’ Fund (UEF), appeals from a…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 342.615(1)(d) — 2 cases
Labor Ready, Inc. v. Johnston, 289 S.W.3d 200 (Ky. 2009). “700, and KRS 342.615. Known commonly as the "exclusive remedy" provision, KRS 342.”
Jse, Inc., D/B/A Perma Staff II v. Patricia Ahart (Ky. 2021). “By way of background, KRS 342.615, codified in 1996, establishes the framework for employee leasing.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 342.615(1)(e) — 3 cases
Brown v. Indiana Ins. Co., 184 S.W.3d 528 (Ky. 2005). “Specifically, KRS 342.615 provides: 342.615. Registration of employee leasing companiesCoverage requirements for lessees Status of temporary help service.”
Jse, Inc., D/B/A Perma Staff II v. Patricia Ahart (Ky. 2021). “By way of background, KRS 342.615, codified in 1996, establishes the framework for employee leasing.”
Lafayette Ins. Co. v. Jerry S. Roberts (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 342.615 (2006). The CGL Policy's definition of employee, therefore, is designed to reflect this distinction as it exists in some states.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 342.615(1)(f) — 1 case
Labor Ready, Inc. v. Johnston, 289 S.W.3d 200 (Ky. 2009). “700, and KRS 342.615. Known commonly as the "exclusive remedy" provision, KRS 342.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 342.615(4) — 3 cases
Labor Ready, Inc. v. Johnston, 289 S.W.3d 200 (Ky. 2009). “700, and KRS 342.615. Known commonly as the "exclusive remedy" provision, KRS 342.”
Kentucky Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Hoskins, 449 S.W.3d 753 (Ky. 2014). “This is a workers’ compensation appeal in which we address for the first time the relationship between the common law loaned servant doctrine and the employee leasing arrangements that are the subject of KRS 342.615. Appellant, Uninsured Employers’ Fund (UEF), appeals from a…”
Jse, Inc., D/B/A Perma Staff II v. Patricia Ahart (Ky. 2021). “By way of background, KRS 342.615, codified in 1996, establishes the framework for employee leasing.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 342.615(5) — 2 cases
Labor Ready, Inc. v. Johnston, 289 S.W.3d 200 (Ky. 2009). “700, and KRS 342.615. Known commonly as the "exclusive remedy" provision, KRS 342.”
Nathaniel Edward Maysey v. Express Servs., Inc. (Ky. 2021). “As for a temporary staffing company, KRS 342.615(5) states that “[a] temporary help service shall be deemed the employer of a temporary worker and shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 342.615(l)(d) — 1 case
Kentucky Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Hoskins, 449 S.W.3d 753 (Ky. 2014). “This is a workers’ compensation appeal in which we address for the first time the relationship between the common law loaned servant doctrine and the employee leasing arrangements that are the subject of KRS 342.615. Appellant, Uninsured Employers’ Fund (UEF), appeals from a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.