Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 342.800 (2026)

Repealed, 1994

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Application to claims -- Filing under Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act. History: Repealed 1994 Ky. Acts ch. 181, sec. 102, effective April 4, 1994. -- Amended 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 290, sec. 5, effective July 15, 1980. -- Created 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 160, sec. 11.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1980–1988 · leading case: Campbell v. Blue Diamond Mining, Inc., 684 S.W.2d 279 (Ky. Ct. App. 1985).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Campbell v. Blue Diamond Mining, Inc., 684 S.W.2d 279 (Ky. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 12× “There is no dispute that the appellant is totally and permanently disabled due to the occupational disease of pneumoconiosis and the only issue confronting this Court is whether the amount of the appellant’s benefits should be reduced under the provisions of KRS 342.800. We do…”

Estridge v. Stovall, 704 S.W.2d 653 (Ky. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 5× “HAYES, Chief Judge: This is an appeal from an order entered by the Harlan Circuit Court, upholding the constitutionality of KRS 342.800 and affirming the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board reducing appellant Estridge’s black lung benefits under that statute.”

Wells v. Estridge, 646 S.W.2d 41 (Ky. 1982). · cites it 7× “When the Fund learned of Estridge’s eligibility for federal black lung benefits, the Fund sought a reduction in state benefits pursuant to KRS 342.800 which provides as follows: Application to claims — filing under Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act— Acts 1976, Ch.”

Kentland Elkhorn Coal Corp. v. Yates, 743 S.W.2d 47 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988). “316; KRS 342.800. On the basis of the record presented to the Board, we find that such Findings of Fact were clearly insufficient to support the Conclusions of Law and judgment.”

Yocom v. Dotson, 607 S.W.2d 121 (Ky. Ct. App. 1980). “We do not pass upon the provisions of KRS 342.800 or the amount of benefits payable pursuant to that statute.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.