Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 367
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.120 (2026)

Legislative intent -- Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The General Assembly finds that the public health, welfare and interest require a strong and effective consumer protection program to protect the public interest and the well-being of both the consumer public and the ethical sellers of goods and services; toward this end, a Consumers' Advisory Council and the Office of Consumer Protection in the Office of the Attorney General are hereby created for the purpose of aiding in the development of preventive and remedial consumer protection programs and enforcing consumer protection statutes. (2) KRS 367.110 to 367.300 may be cited as the "Consumer Protection Act." Effective: April 5, 2024 History: Amended 2024 Ky. Acts ch. 112, sec. 14, effective April 5, 2024. -- Created 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 4, sec. 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1976–2025 · leading case: State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Norcold, Inc., 849 F.3d 328 (6th Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Norcold, Inc., 849 F.3d 328 (6th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “, Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.120 et seq. (Kentucky Consumer Protection Act); Ky.”
Arnold v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 392 F. Supp. 3d 747 (E.D. Ky. 2019). · cites it 2× “Consequently, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants' conduct "constitute[s] fraud and runs contrary to Kentucky Consumer Protection Act," Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.120, et seq. , "and the Kentucky Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act," Ky.”
Kentucky Employers Mut. Ins. v. Coleman, 236 S.W.3d 9 (Ky. 2007). · cites it 2× “12-230, and CPA, KRS 367.120, and 367.220. In Blank , the ALJ had previously denied the Workers' interlocutory request for relief on his surgery bills for reasons "the employer raised a sufficient issue .”
Craig & Bishop, Inc. v. Piles, 247 S.W.3d 897 (Ky. 2008). · cites it 2× “KRS 367.120 Legislative intent; title (1) The General Assembly finds that the public health, welfare and interest require a strong and effective consumer protection program to protect the public interest and the well-being of both the consumer public and the ethical sellers of…”
Ford Motor Co. v. Mayes, 575 S.W.2d 480 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978). “KRS 367.120(1). Public policy dictates that Ford not be permitted to limit the statutory remedy of consumers to recover “actual damages” under KRS 367.”
Vonderhaar v. At&T Mobility Servs., LLC, 372 F. Supp. 3d 497 (E.D. Ky. 2019). · cites it 2× “(nonexistent); and (f) the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act, KRS § 367.120 et seq. ( See. Doc. 1-1, ¶ 45).”
Suhail v. Univ. of the Cumberlands, 107 F. Supp. 3d 748 (E.D. Ky. 2015). · cites it 2× “” KRS § 367.120. It provides a cause of action to those who believe they have been harmed in violation of the Act.”
Keeton v. Lexington Truck Sales, Inc., 275 S.W.3d 723 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008). “Keeton next contends his claims under the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act, KRS 367.120 et seq., and the federal Mag-nuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.”
Com. Ex Rel. Beshear v. ABAC Pest Control, 621 S.W.2d 705 (Ky. Ct. App. 1981). “See KRS 367.120. In re Glen Turner Enterprises Litigation, 521 F.”
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hancock v. Pineur, 533 S.W.2d 527 (Ky. 1976). “See KRS 367.120, 367.240 and 367.260. The demand was directed to Pineur not as an individual but in his capacity as an officer or agent of four affiliated corporations engaged in the selling of mobile homes in this state.”
Barnett v. First Nat'l Bank of Omaha (W.D. Ky. 2022). · cites it 2× “” Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.120. “It provides a cause of action to those who believe they have been harmed in violation of the Act.”
Oppong v. Owensboro Health Med. Grp. Inc (W.D. Ky. 2023). “KRS 367.120(2). He contends that OHMG violated the statute’s prohibition against unfair, false, misleading or deceptive practices in trade or commerce (Id.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.120(1) — 2 cases
Ford Motor Co. v. Mayes, 575 S.W.2d 480 (Ky. Ct. App. 1978). “KRS 367.120(1). Public policy dictates that Ford not be permitted to limit the statutory remedy of consumers to recover “actual damages” under KRS 367.”
Craig & Bishop, Inc. v. Piles, 247 S.W.3d 897 (Ky. 2008). “KRS 367.120 Legislative intent; title (1) The General Assembly finds that the public health, welfare and interest require a strong and effective consumer protection program to protect the public interest and the well-being of both the consumer public and the ethical sellers of…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.120(2) — 1 case
Oppong v. Owensboro Health Med. Grp. Inc (W.D. Ky. 2023). “KRS 367.120(2). He contends that OHMG violated the statute’s prohibition against unfair, false, misleading or deceptive practices in trade or commerce (Id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.