Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378A.030 (2026)

Value

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Value is given for a transfer or an obligation if, in exchange for the transfer or obligation, property is transferred or an antecedent debt is secured or satisfied, but value does not include an unperformed promise made otherwise than in the ordinary course of the promisor's business to furnish support to the debtor or another person.

(2) For the purposes of KRS 378A.040(1)(b) and 378A.050, a person gives a reasonably equivalent value if the person acquires an interest of the debtor in an asset pursuant to a regularly conducted, noncollusive foreclosure sale or execution of a power of sale for the acquisition or disposition of the interest of the debtor upon default under a mortgage, deed of trust, or security agreement.

(3) A transfer is made for present value if the exchange between the debtor and the transferee is intended by them to be contemporaneous and is in fact substantially contemporaneous. Effective: January 1, 2016 History: Created 2015 Ky. Acts ch. 37, sec. 3, effective January 1, 2016.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2023 · leading case: Parton v. Parton (E.D. Ky. 2022).
Parton v. Parton (E.D. Ky. 2022). · cites it 4× “KRS § 378A.030(1). Some transfers satisfied a Legal Liability Payable owed to Johnny Parton.”
Parton v. Parton (E.D. Ky. 2023). · cites it 2× “KRS § 378A.030(1). The issue is whether the value of the satisfied debt was reasonably equivalent to the value of the transferred equipment.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 378A.030(1) — 2 cases
Parton v. Parton (E.D. Ky. 2022). “KRS § 378A.030(1). Some transfers satisfied a Legal Liability Payable owed to Johnny Parton.”
Parton v. Parton (E.D. Ky. 2023). “KRS § 378A.030(1). The issue is whether the value of the satisfied debt was reasonably equivalent to the value of the transferred equipment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.