Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 386B
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 386B.2-010 (2026)

Role of court in administration of trust

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The court may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent its jurisdiction is invoked by an interested person or as provided by law.

(2) A trust is not subject to continuing judicial supervision unless ordered by the court.

(3) A judicial proceeding involving a trust may relate to any matter involving the trust's administration, including a request for instructions, an action to declare rights, and an action to settle the trustee's accounts. Effective: July 15, 2014 History: Created 2014 Ky. Acts ch. 25, sec. 13, effective July 15, 2014.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2018–2025 · leading case: Davis v. Davis, 563 S.W.3d 105 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Davis v. Davis, 563 S.W.3d 105 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018). “KRS 386B.2-010(2). However, through the course of its administration various matters may arise requiring court intervention.”
Brett Kincaid v. Michael D. Foley, Member of the Advisory Comm. Fund C Created Under the Trust Agreement of Garvice D. Kincaid, Dated February 26, 1964, as Amended (Ky. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 3× “As a result, and pursuant to KRS 386B.2-010, this Court should grant its advice and instructions to the Advisory Committee, declaring whether or not the Advisory Committee may direct and instruct Central Bank to sell a portion of the Central Bancshares stock held by Fund C—and…”
Est. of Phillis T. Worrall by James Worrall v. J.P. Morgan Bank, N.A., Tr. of the James P. Thompson Trust (Ky. 2022). “8-180, governs over the general statute, KRS 386B.2-010, which authorizes court intervention in trust administration.”
Kevin A. McKim v. Mary K. McKim (Ky. Ct. App. 2023). “” KRS 386B.2-010(1). Mary disagrees, arguing that any standing Theresa – as a mere contingent successor trustee – may have held was lost when she was duly replaced prior to the occurrence of the condition for her appointment.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 386B.2-010(1) — 1 case
Kevin A. McKim v. Mary K. McKim (Ky. Ct. App. 2023). “” KRS 386B.2-010(1). Mary disagrees, arguing that any standing Theresa – as a mere contingent successor trustee – may have held was lost when she was duly replaced prior to the occurrence of the condition for her appointment.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 386B.2-010(2) — 1 case
Davis v. Davis, 563 S.W.3d 105 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018). “KRS 386B.2-010(2). However, through the course of its administration various matters may arise requiring court intervention.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.