Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 394.290 (2026)

Repealed, 1960

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Appeal to Court of Appeals. History: Repealed 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 104, sec. 22, effective June 16, 1960. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 4850.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1945–1959 · leading case: Midlow v. Ray's Adm'x, 194 S.W.2d 847 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Midlow v. Ray's Adm'x, 194 S.W.2d 847 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946). “This action did not begin as a will probate case and it is not now an appeal from a judgment admitting a will to record as provided by KRS 394.290. This was an action seeking to have the court construe a document, which appellees alleged was the will of Leon Ray, who died, the…”

Schultz v. Schultz, 332 S.W.2d 253 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). “While this particular question pertaining to the extension of time for an appeal from a declaratory judgment has not heretofore been presented to the court, we have considered an analogous statute relating to the limitation of time for an appeal from a judgment in a will contest…”

Alexander v. Stewart, 192 S.W.2d 204 (Ky. Ct. App. 1945). “240 and KRS 394.290. The ultimate aim and purpose of petitioners is to probate and execute their decedent’s purported last will and thereafter to settle and terminate his estate in the manner provided by law, all in the proper probate court of their county.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.