Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 403
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.450 (2026)

Repealed, 2004

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Simultaneous proceedings in other states. History: Repealed 2004 Ky. Acts ch. 133, sec. 46, effective July 13, 2004. -- Created 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 69, sec. 6, effective July 15, 1980.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1993–2008 · leading case: Karahalios v. Karahalios, 848 S.W.2d 457 (Ky. Ct. App. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Karahalios v. Karahalios, 848 S.W.2d 457 (Ky. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “He argues that the circuit court either failed to, or was prevented from, performing its duties as set forth in KRS 403.450. 3 KRS 403.450(3) states as follows: (3) If the court is informed during the course of the proceeding that a proceeding concerning the custody of the child…”
Gullett v. Gullett, 992 S.W.2d 866 (Ky. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “24, the equivalent of KRS 403.450, an Ohio Court shall not exercise its jurisdiction .”
Goff v. Goff, 172 S.W.3d 352 (Ky. 2005). · cites it 2× “33 Moreover, courts must clearly communicate by virtue of KRS 403.450(3). In this case, Tennessee declined to hear a motion offered by Ms.”
Cann v. Howard, 850 S.W.2d 57 (Ky. Ct. App. 1993). “See KRS 403.450(2); cf. Tenenbaum v. Sprecher, 133 A.”
Skinner v. Skinner, 249 S.W.3d 196 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008). “See KRS 403.450 which says that Kentucky shall not exercise Jurisdiction if a proceeding in another State is pending and that State is exercising jurisdiction consistent with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, which Tennessee does.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.450(2) — 1 case
Cann v. Howard, 850 S.W.2d 57 (Ky. Ct. App. 1993). “See KRS 403.450(2); cf. Tenenbaum v. Sprecher, 133 A.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.450(3) — 2 cases
Karahalios v. Karahalios, 848 S.W.2d 457 (Ky. Ct. App. 1993). “He argues that the circuit court either failed to, or was prevented from, performing its duties as set forth in KRS 403.450. 3 KRS 403.450(3) states as follows: (3) If the court is informed during the course of the proceeding that a proceeding concerning the custody of the child…”
Goff v. Goff, 172 S.W.3d 352 (Ky. 2005). “33 Moreover, courts must clearly communicate by virtue of KRS 403.450(3). In this case, Tennessee declined to hear a motion offered by Ms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.