(1) In a proceeding to establish or enforce a support order or to determine parentage of a child, a tribunal of this state may exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident individual or the individual's guardian or conservator if:
(a) The individual is personally served with summons, or notice within this state;
(b) The individual submits to the jurisdiction of this state by consent in a record, by entering a general appearance, or by filing a responsive pleading having the effect of waiving any contest to personal jurisdiction;
(c) The individual resided with the child in this state;
(d) The individual resided in this state and provided prenatal expenses or support for the child;
(e) The child resides in this state as a result of the acts or directives of the individual;
(f) The individual engaged in sexual intercourse in this state and the child may have been conceived by that act of intercourse;
(g) The individual asserted parentage of a child in the putative father registry maintained in this state by the Office of the Attorney General; or
(h) There is any other basis consistent with the constitutions of this state and the United States for the exercise of personal jurisdiction.
(2) The bases of personal jurisdiction set forth in subsection (1) of this section or in any other law of this state may not be used to acquire personal jurisdiction for a tribunal of this state to modify a child support order of another state unless the requirements of KRS 407.5611 are met, or, in the case of a foreign support order, unless the requirements of KRS 407.5615 are met. Effective: July 1, 2025 History: Amended 2023 Ky. Acts ch. 124, sec. 60, effective July 1, 2025. -- Amended 2015 Ky. Acts ch. 18, sec. 4, effective June 24, 2015. -- Amended 2005 Ky. Acts ch. 99, sec. 642, effective June 20, 2005. -- Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 426, sec. 594, effective July 15, 1998.-- Contingent effective date repealed 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 101, sec. 20, effective March 23, 1998. -- Created 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 365, sec. 16, effective upon contingency.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2023 · leading case:
Nordike v. Nordike, 231 S.W.3d 733 (Ky. 2007).
Nordike v. Nordike, 231 S.W.3d 733 (Ky. 2007).
· cites it 3× “The trial court denied Holcomb’s motion in an order signed October 19, 2004, stating that it had not previously accepted jurisdiction over child support matters and lacked jurisdiction to do so pursuant to UIFSA, specifically KRS 407.5201, because it had no personal jurisdiction…”
Adams-Smyrichinsky v. Smyrichinsky, 467 S.W.3d 767 (Ky. 2015).
“See KRS 407.5201 (laying out eight circumstances in which there is personal jurisdiction, including that the individual conceived the child in Kentucky).”
Soileau v. Bowman, 382 S.W.3d 888 (Ky. Ct. App. 2012).
“210 and KRS 407.5201 permit the court to exercise personal jurisdiction over William.”
Roberts v. Bedard, 357 S.W.3d 554 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 4× “KRS 407.5201 is such a statute. Id. Next, the Court discussed subject-matter jurisdiction: Often, discussions of jurisdiction concern subject-matter jurisdiction, or the court’s power to hear and rule on a particular type of controversy.”
Ijeoma Odigwe v. Lauren Andrini (Ky. Ct. App. 2023).
· cites it 4× “Andrini responded that Odigwe effectively registered the child support order when he registered the Consent Judgment (with the included child support order and worksheet) and had waived jurisdictional arguments by not objecting to UIFSA jurisdiction when he filed his petition to…”
Bonnie Jean Nordike Now Holcomb v. Michael D. Nordike (Ky. 2007).
· cites it 4× “The trial court denied Holcomb's motion in an order signed October 19, 2004, stating that it had not previously accepted jurisdiction over child support matters and lacked jurisdiction to do so pursuant to UIFSA, specifically KRS 407.5201, because it had no personal jurisdiction…”
Ijeoma Odigwe v. Honorable Jay Wethington (Ky. 2022).
“Specifically, he contended that the court did not have personal jurisdiction over him because none of the criteria listed in KRS 407.5201, which provides a number of bases for a Kentucky court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident for the purposes of modifying a…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 407.5201(1) — 2 cases
Roberts v. Bedard, 357 S.W.3d 554 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011).
“KRS 407.5201 is such a statute. Id. Next, the Court discussed subject-matter jurisdiction: Often, discussions of jurisdiction concern subject-matter jurisdiction, or the court’s power to hear and rule on a particular type of controversy.”
Ijeoma Odigwe v. Lauren Andrini (Ky. Ct. App. 2023).
“Andrini responded that Odigwe effectively registered the child support order when he registered the Consent Judgment (with the included child support order and worksheet) and had waived jurisdictional arguments by not objecting to UIFSA jurisdiction when he filed his petition to…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 407.5201(2) — 1 case
Ijeoma Odigwe v. Lauren Andrini (Ky. Ct. App. 2023).
“Andrini responded that Odigwe effectively registered the child support order when he registered the Consent Judgment (with the included child support order and worksheet) and had waived jurisdictional arguments by not objecting to UIFSA jurisdiction when he filed his petition to…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 407.5201(5) — 1 case
Roberts v. Bedard, 357 S.W.3d 554 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011).
“KRS 407.5201 is such a statute. Id. Next, the Court discussed subject-matter jurisdiction: Often, discussions of jurisdiction concern subject-matter jurisdiction, or the court’s power to hear and rule on a particular type of controversy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.