Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 413
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 413.200 (2026)

Repealed, 1988

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Action against personal representative who has settled accounts. History: Repealed 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 90, sec. 32, effective July 15, 1988. -- Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 299, sec. 5. --Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 2529.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1946–2026 · leading case: Anderson v. Brady, 7 F.R.D. 84 (E.D. Ky. 1946).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Anderson v. Brady, 7 F.R.D. 84 (E.D. Ky. 1946). · cites it 2× “To permit this amendment to be filed would be in effect to permit the bringing of the action against new parties in whose favor the statute of limitation has long since run.”
Vaughn v. Perkins, 576 S.W.2d 257 (Ky. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “The trial court also held that the action was barred by the seven year statute of limitations provided by KRS 413.200. 1 Even if limitations began to run with the filing of the settlement in 1968, the seven year statute of limitations would be inapplicable.”
Vowels (W.D. Ky. 2026). · cites it 3× “§ 413.200, KRS § 411.184, and related consumer and debt collection protections.”
Vowels (W.D. Ky. 2026). · cites it 2× “Section 413.200 of Ky. Rev. Stat. is a repealed statute entitled, “Action against personal representative who has settled accounts,” which appears to have set a limitations period for actions against fiduciaries in the probate context, see Vaughn v.”
Ladd v. Overcast, 386 S.W.2d 949 (Ky. Ct. App. 1965). “210 is read in connection with KRS 413.200 and KRS 413.220(1), (2), and (3), it is obvious that the Legislature intended to require creditors to bring their actions on claims against the heirs and devisees of a decedent jointly with decedent’s personal representative, or against…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.