Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 417
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 417.220 (2026)

Appeals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) An appeal may be taken from: (a) An order denying an application to compel arbitration made under KRS 417.060; (b) An order granting an application to stay arbitration made under subsection (2) of KRS 417.060; (c) An order confirming or denying confirmation of an award; (d) An order modifying or correcting an award; (e) An order vacating an award without directing a rehearing; or (f) A judgment or decree entered pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. (2) The appeal shall be taken in the manner and to the same extent as from orders or judgments in a civil action. Effective: July 13, 1984 History: Created 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 278, sec. 18, effective July 13, 1984.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58 cases (20 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Kindred Hospitals Ltd. P'ship v. Lutrell, 190 S.W.3d 916 (Ky. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kindred Hospitals Ltd. P'ship v. Lutrell, 190 S.W.3d 916 (Ky. 2006). · cites it 22× “07 to present their challenge to this Court and, in doing so, they chose a form of relief that is inconsistent with the remedy provided under KRS 417.220. (Citations omitted). The Kentucky Uniform Arbitration Act (“KUAA”) provides for appeals from “[a] judgment or decree entered…”
Padgett v. Steinbrecher, 355 S.W.3d 457 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 8× “In 1984, however, the Kentucky Legislature adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act 2 and, in turn, KRS 417.220(1), which provides for the immediate appeal of certain interlocutory orders that are hostile to arbitration.”
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Bluegrass Powerboats, 424 S.W.3d 902 (Ky. 2014). · cites it 7× “Citing KRS 417.220, Chase then took an immediate interlocutory appeal of the order denying its motion to confirm the arbitration order.”
Louisville Peterbilt, Inc. v. Cox, 132 S.W.3d 850 (Ky. 2004). · cites it 3× “It is also not necessary to address Cox’s argument that LPI somehow waived its argument under the FAA because it brought the current action under KRS 417.220 (which allows appeals from orders denying arbitration made pursuant to KRS 417.”
Linden v. Griffin, 436 S.W.3d 521 (Ky. 2014). · cites it 6× “Linden’s appeal presented the Court of Appeals with a bevy of arguments, including the constitutionality of KRS 417.220(1)(a), the validity and scope of the arbitration clause, and whether, post appeal, the trial court would retain jurisdiction to issue an injunction pending…”
Olshan Found. Repair & Waterproofing v. Otto, 276 S.W.3d 827 (Ky. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “It directs our attention to KRS 417.220, wherein the General Assembly created a statutory right to interlocutory appeal arising under the Kentucky Uniform Arbitration Act (“KUAA”).”
Extendicare Homes, Inc. v. Whisman, 478 S.W.3d 306 (Ky. 2015). · cites it 2× “09 are the proper procedural vehicles for appellate review of .trial court orders denying motions to compel arbitration, especially where, as here, the interlocutory appeal provision of the Kentucky Arbitration Act, KRS 417.”
North Fork Collieries, LLC v. Hall, 322 S.W.3d 98 (Ky. 2010). · cites it 2× “09 as appropriate avenues for the review of trial court orders denying motions to compel arbitration, particularly when, as here, the KRS 417.220 right to an interlocutory appeal does not apply.”
Conseco Fin. Servicing Corp. v. Wilder, 47 S.W.3d 335 (Ky. Ct. App. 2001). “Finally, because an ordinary appeal at the close of litigation will not often provide an adequate remedy for the wrongful denial of a right to arbitrate, KRS 417.220 provides in pertinent part that (1) An appeal may be taken from: (a) An order denying an application to compel…”
Breathitt Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Prater, 292 S.W.3d 883 (Ky. 2009). “KRS 417.220 permits an interlocutory appeal from “[a]n order denying an application to compel arbitration.”
East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Werline, 307 S.W.3d 267 (Tex. 2010). “§ 5-418 ; Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 417.220; Me. Rev.Stat.”
Kindred Nursing Centers Ltd. P'ship v. Sloan, 329 S.W.3d 347 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010). “Appellate review of an otherwise unap-pealable interlocutory order arises under KRS 417.220(l)(a). The standard of review by our Court from appeals arising under this statute was discussed in Conseco Finance Servicing Corp.”
Show all 58 citing cases →
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 417.220(1) — 16 cases
Kindred Hospitals Ltd. P'ship v. Lutrell, 190 S.W.3d 916 (Ky. 2006). “07 to present their challenge to this Court and, in doing so, they chose a form of relief that is inconsistent with the remedy provided under KRS 417.220. (Citations omitted). The Kentucky Uniform Arbitration Act (“KUAA”) provides for appeals from “[a] judgment or decree entered…”
Olshan Found. Repair & Waterproofing v. Otto, 276 S.W.3d 827 (Ky. Ct. App. 2009). “It directs our attention to KRS 417.220, wherein the General Assembly created a statutory right to interlocutory appeal arising under the Kentucky Uniform Arbitration Act (“KUAA”).”
Padgett v. Steinbrecher, 355 S.W.3d 457 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011). “In 1984, however, the Kentucky Legislature adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act 2 and, in turn, KRS 417.220(1), which provides for the immediate appeal of certain interlocutory orders that are hostile to arbitration.”
Genesis Healthcare, LLC v. Stevens, 544 S.W.3d 645 (Ky. Ct. App. 2017).
New Meadowview Health & Rehab. Ctr., LLC v. Booker, 550 S.W.3d 56 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 417.220(1)(a) — 16 cases
Linden v. Griffin, 436 S.W.3d 521 (Ky. 2014). “Linden’s appeal presented the Court of Appeals with a bevy of arguments, including the constitutionality of KRS 417.220(1)(a), the validity and scope of the arbitration clause, and whether, post appeal, the trial court would retain jurisdiction to issue an injunction pending…”
Bridgestone/Firestone v. McQueen, 3 S.W.3d 366 (Ky. Ct. App. 1999).
Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Sprowls, 82 S.W.3d 193 (Ky. 2002).
GGNSC Stanford, LLC v. Rowe, 388 S.W.3d 117 (Ky. Ct. App. 2012).
Signature Healthcare, LLC v. Appalachian Reg'l Healthcare, Inc. (Ky. Ct. App. 2025).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 417.220(2) — 5 cases
Kindred Hospitals Ltd. P'ship v. Lutrell, 190 S.W.3d 916 (Ky. 2006). “07 to present their challenge to this Court and, in doing so, they chose a form of relief that is inconsistent with the remedy provided under KRS 417.220. (Citations omitted). The Kentucky Uniform Arbitration Act (“KUAA”) provides for appeals from “[a] judgment or decree entered…”
Padgett v. Steinbrecher, 355 S.W.3d 457 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011). “In 1984, however, the Kentucky Legislature adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act 2 and, in turn, KRS 417.220(1), which provides for the immediate appeal of certain interlocutory orders that are hostile to arbitration.”
Frankfort Med. Investors, LLC v. Thomas by & Through Thomas, 577 S.W.3d 484 (Ky. Ct. App. 2019).
Lp Louisville Lynn Way, LLC D/B/A Signature Healthcare at Jefferson Manor Rehab & Wellness Ctr. v. Albert Ray Woford, as the of the Est. of Betty Ann Woford (Ky. Ct. App. 2024).
Blc Lexington Snf, LLC D/B/A Brookdale Richmond Place Snf D/B/A Richmond Place Rehab. & Health Ctr. v. Bonnie Townsend, of the Est. of Linda Elam & on Behalf of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Linda Elam (Ky. Ct. App. 2025).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 417.220(l)(a) — 8 cases
Padgett v. Steinbrecher, 355 S.W.3d 457 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011). “In 1984, however, the Kentucky Legislature adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act 2 and, in turn, KRS 417.220(1), which provides for the immediate appeal of certain interlocutory orders that are hostile to arbitration.”
Louisville Peterbilt, Inc. v. Cox, 132 S.W.3d 850 (Ky. 2004). “It is also not necessary to address Cox’s argument that LPI somehow waived its argument under the FAA because it brought the current action under KRS 417.220 (which allows appeals from orders denying arbitration made pursuant to KRS 417.”
Linden v. Griffin, 436 S.W.3d 521 (Ky. 2014). “Linden’s appeal presented the Court of Appeals with a bevy of arguments, including the constitutionality of KRS 417.220(1)(a), the validity and scope of the arbitration clause, and whether, post appeal, the trial court would retain jurisdiction to issue an injunction pending…”
Extendicare Homes, Inc. v. Whisman, 478 S.W.3d 306 (Ky. 2015). “09 are the proper procedural vehicles for appellate review of .trial court orders denying motions to compel arbitration, especially where, as here, the interlocutory appeal provision of the Kentucky Arbitration Act, KRS 417.”
Kindred Nursing Centers Ltd. P'ship v. Sloan, 329 S.W.3d 347 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010). “Appellate review of an otherwise unap-pealable interlocutory order arises under KRS 417.220(l)(a). The standard of review by our Court from appeals arising under this statute was discussed in Conseco Finance Servicing Corp.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 417.220(l)(c) — 1 case
Stephen D. Prater Builder, Inc. v. Larmar Lodging Corp., 441 S.W.3d 133 (Ky. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 417.220(l)(f) — 1 case
Kindred Hospitals Ltd. P'ship v. Lutrell, 190 S.W.3d 916 (Ky. 2006). “07 to present their challenge to this Court and, in doing so, they chose a form of relief that is inconsistent with the remedy provided under KRS 417.220. (Citations omitted). The Kentucky Uniform Arbitration Act (“KUAA”) provides for appeals from “[a] judgment or decree entered…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.