Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 433.150 (2026)

Repealed, effective January 1, 1975

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Armed assault with intent to rob. History: Repealed 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 336, effective January 1, 1975. -- Amended 1966 Ky. Acts ch. 48, sec. 2. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 1160.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 49 cases, 1945–1977 · leading case: Knuckles v. Commonwealth, 261 S.W.2d 667 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
Knuckles v. Commonwealth, 261 S.W.2d 667 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). · cites it 4× “Lowell Knuckles was jointly indicted with Willis Bryant for the crime of assault with intent to rob by the use of an offensive weapon, a crime denounced by KRS 433.150. A severance having been granted by the Harlan Circuit Court, the Commonwealth elected to try Knuckles.”
Kimbrough v. Commonwealth, 550 S.W.2d 525 (Ky. 1977). “Appellant was subsequently indicted by the Jefferson County grand jury and charged with one count of armed assault with intent to rob, in violation of former KRS 433.150, and as a habitual criminal within the meaning of former KRS 431.”
Sherley v. Commonwealth, 558 S.W.2d 615 (Ky. 1977). “The section which is comparable to first-degree robbery is KRS 433.150 (repealed). This section provided that any person who, with an offensive weapon or instrument, unlawfully and maliciously assaults another with intent to rob or commits a robbery be confined for not less than…”
Brooks v. Commonwealth, 447 S.W.2d 614 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969). · cites it 3× “On March 6, 1964, with court-appointed counsel, the appellant and Ferguson submitted guilty pleas to the charge of assault with intent to rob Lindsey in contravention of KRS 433.150 and waived trial by jury. Each of them was sentenced to imprison *616 ment for life.”
Adams v. Commonwealth, 264 S.W.2d 283 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954). · cites it 3× “The appellant was convicted of assault with intent to rob under KRS 433.150, and sentenced to 21 years in prison.”
Roberts v. Commonwealth, 350 S.W.2d 626 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961). · cites it 3× “Glenn Roberts was indicted for armed assault with intent to rob as denounced by KRS 433.150. Upon his trial in January, 1961, he was found guilty of ordinary robbery under KRS 433.”
Cotton v. Commonwealth, 454 S.W.2d 698 (Ky. Ct. App. 1970). “Appellant, Gilbert Cotton, was found guilty by a trial jury of attempted armed robbery (KRS 433.150) of the Fihe-Kupper Pharmacy, Shively, Kentucky, and of the armed robbery (KRS 433.”
Wheeler v. Commonwealth, 395 S.W.2d 565 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). · cites it 3× “KRS 433.150. Appellant rests his appeal upon four claimed errors: (1) the indictment was defective for failure to name the principal or give a description of his acts or participation in the crime charged; (2) there was a fatal variance between the allegations of the indictment…”
Roberts v. Commonwealth, 339 S.W.2d 640 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960). · cites it 2× “The appellant, Glenn Roberts, was convicted and sentenced to 21 years’ imprisonment under an indictment charging him with armed assault with intent to rob (KRS 433.150). He contends on this appeal that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a continuance; that the evidence…”
Ross v. Commonwealth, 577 S.W.2d 6 (Ky. Ct. App. 1977). “KRS 433.150. On joint motion of the defendants and the Commonwealth, the trial court granted a change of venue and transferred the case to the Estill Circuit Court for trial.”
Weber v. Commonwealth, 196 S.W.2d 465 (Ky. Ct. App. 1946). “It is usually said that assault and battery is a lesser degree of an assault with intent to rob (KRS 433.150), the minimum punishment for which, as we have noted, is 21 years imprisonment and the maximum death; also of the felony of malicious wounding with intent to kill (KRS…”
Underhill v. Commonwealth, 289 S.W.2d 509 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). · cites it 2× “KRS 433.150. Upon trial, they were convicted and sentenced to 21 years in prison.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.