Ky. Rev. Stat. § 441.810

Composition of authority -- Appointment -- Terms

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The regional jail authority shall be composed of members appointed by the county judges/executive of the respective counties within the authority and the jailer of the county where the regional jail is located. The county judge/executive of the most populous county shall appoint three (3) members to the authority, and the remainder of the county judges/executive shall each appoint two (2) members. (2) Members of the authority shall serve four (4) year terms, except that one (1) of each county judge/executive's original appointees shall serve a two (2) year term. Members of the authority shall not be compensated for their service but may be reimbursed for expenses actually incurred. Effective: July 13, 1984 History: Created 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 415, sec. 14, effective July 13, 1984.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2020 · leading case: Noble v. Three Forks Regional Jail Authority

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Noble v. Three Forks Regional Jail Authority (2014) kyed · cites it 2× “Three Forks Jail was established under KRS § 441.810, as a regional jail for Breathitt, Lee, Owsley, and Wolfe Counties, in Kentucky.”

Three Forks Regional Jail v. the Estate of Ricky Combs by and Through Connie Hollan, Administratrix (2020) kyctapp · cites it 2× “” According to the motion for summary judgment, Three Forks Regional Jail was established under KRS 441.810 as a regional jail for Lee, Breathitt, Wolfe, and Owsley Counties.”

— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 441.810(1) — 1 case

Three Forks Regional Jail v. the Estate of Ricky Combs by and Through Connie Hollan, Administratrix (2020) kyctapp “” According to the motion for summary judgment, Three Forks Regional Jail was established under KRS 441.810 as a regional jail for Lee, Breathitt, Wolfe, and Owsley Counties.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.