Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 454.150 (2026)

Procedure for restoration of money received by the Commonwealth where

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

judgment rendered upon constructive service is modified or set aside. When the Commonwealth shall have received money under a judgment rendered upon constructive service, and the defendant did not appear, and such judgment is thereafter modified or set aside under the provisions of the Rules of Civil Procedure, upon a retrial, the court in making an order for the restoration of such money, shall direct the proper financial officer of the Commonwealth to draw his warrant upon the Treasurer for the proper amount in favor of the party in whose favor the order of restoration may be made, and it shall thereupon become the duty of such officer to draw his warrant in obedience to such order. Effective: July 1, 1953 History: Transferred 1952 Ky. Acts ch. 84, secs. 1 and 15, effective July 1, 1953, from C.C. sec. 414. -- C.C. sec. 414 amended 1888 Ky. Acts ch. 1471, sec. 2.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: London City Council v. Randall Weddle (Ky. 2025).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

London City Council v. Randall Weddle (Ky. 2025). · cites it 2× “The trial court and Court of Appeals held the parties had entered a general appearance before the trial court pursuant to motion practice, which the Movants dispute. Regardless of the decisions of the courts below, we disagree with the Movants that service was defective…”

— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 454.150(1) — 1 case

London City Council v. Randall Weddle (Ky. 2025). “The trial court and Court of Appeals held the parties had entered a general appearance before the trial court pursuant to motion practice, which the Movants dispute. Regardless of the decisions of the courts below, we disagree with the Movants that service was defective…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.