Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 48.620 (2026)

Revision of allotment schedule

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Allotments shall be made as provided by the allotment schedule, and may be revised upon the written certification of the Governor, the Chief Justice, and the Legislative Research Commission for their respective branches of government. No revisions of the allotment schedule may provide for an allotment or allotments in excess of the amount appropriated to that budget unit in a branch budget bill, or for expenditure for any other purpose than specified in a branch budget bill.

(2) Revisions of allotments under this section shall be reported and reviewed as provided by KRS 48.500(3). Effective: June 8, 2011 History: Amended 2011 Ky. Acts ch. 73, sec. 13, effective June 8, 2011. -- Amended 2009 Ky. Acts ch. 78, sec. 15, effective June 25, 2009. -- Amended 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 507, sec. 16, effective July 13, 1990. -- Created 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 450, sec. 27, effective July 1, 1983.

Notes of Decisions
Jim Wayne in His Off. Capacity as State Rep. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor, 498 S.W.3d 355 (Ky. 2016). · cites it 116× “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
Commonwealth of Kentucky Ex Rel. Andy Beshear, Attorney Gen. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Ex Rel. Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor (Ky. 2016). · cites it 40× “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
Jim Wayne in His Off. Capacity as State Rep. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor (Ky. 2016). · cites it 40× “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
Commonwealth of Kentucky Ex Rel. Andy Beshear, Attorney Gen. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Ex Rel. Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor (Ky. 2016). · cites it 40× “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
Jim Wayne in His Off. Capacity as State Rep. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor (Ky. 2017). · cites it 40× “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
Commonwealth of Kentucky Ex Rel. Andy Beshear, Attorney Gen. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Ex Rel. Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor (Ky. 2017). · cites it 40× “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 48.620(1) — 6 cases
Jim Wayne in His Off. Capacity as State Rep. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor, 498 S.W.3d 355 (Ky. 2016). “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
Commonwealth of Kentucky Ex Rel. Andy Beshear, Attorney Gen. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Ex Rel. Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor (Ky. 2016). “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
Jim Wayne in His Off. Capacity as State Rep. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor (Ky. 2016). “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
Commonwealth of Kentucky Ex Rel. Andy Beshear, Attorney Gen. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Ex Rel. Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor (Ky. 2016). “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
Jim Wayne in His Off. Capacity as State Rep. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Off. of the Governor Matthew Bevin in His Off. Capacity as Governor (Ky. 2017). “The Attorney General disputed that KRS 48.620 gave the Governor such broad authority and argued that any such reading of the statute would violate the separation-of-powers doctrine and constitute an improper delegation of authority by the General Assembly.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.