Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 500.095 (2026)

Alternative sentence of community work

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) In every case in which a person pleads guilty to or is convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment, the judge shall consider whether the person should be sentenced to a term of community service as an alternative to the prison term. The term of community service shall not be shorter than the length of the prison term nor longer than twice the length of the prison term. Failure to complete the prescribed term of community service shall be deemed a probation violation and shall subject the defendant to serve the prison service originally fixed by the court or jury. (2) The clerk of the Circuit Court, under the direction of the Circuit Judges of the circuit and in cooperation with the Administrative Office of the Courts and the governmental units within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court, shall maintain a schedule of community service work and projects for use by judges in setting alternative sentences. Any city, county, urban-county, or other governmental unit desiring to participate in alternative sentence community service work and projects shall submit to the clerk, on or before January 1, 1991, and every six (6) months thereafter, a list of community service work and projects it proposes for inclusion in the schedule. (3) The Administrative Office of the Courts, under the direction of the Supreme Court, shall prepare a schedule of approved categories of alternative sentences which shall be disseminated to all judges and circuit clerks. Effective: July 13, 1990 History: Created 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 497, sec. 3, effective July 13, 1990.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1991–1994 · leading case: Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942 (Ky. Ct. App. 1992).
Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942 (Ky. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 24× “He now argues that the trial court erred by refusing to strike a juror for cause, for prohibiting him from introducing the victim's mental health records, and by refusing to consider alternative sentencing as required by KRS 500.095. Considering all of the particular facts in…”
Porter v. Commonwealth, 841 S.W.2d 166 (Ky. 1992). · cites it 5× “Appellant maintains the 1990 enactment of KRS 500.095, an alternative sentencing statute, indicates legislative intent that community service be considered in every case that may be punished by imprisonment.”
Renaker v. Commonwealth, 889 S.W.2d 819 (Ky. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 10× “At the sentencing hearing, Renaker’s attorney requested that Renaker be sentenced to community service rather than prison, according to KRS 500.095. Additionally, he attached letters and a memorandum to support his position, contending that KRS 500.”
Corman v. Commonwealth, 822 S.W.2d 421 (Ky. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “Corman contends that the court erred in refusing to consider an alternative sentencing plan as required by KRS 500.095. The trial court relied on KRS 533.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 500.095(1) — 3 cases
Williams v. Commonwealth, 829 S.W.2d 942 (Ky. Ct. App. 1992). “He now argues that the trial court erred by refusing to strike a juror for cause, for prohibiting him from introducing the victim's mental health records, and by refusing to consider alternative sentencing as required by KRS 500.095. Considering all of the particular facts in…”
Porter v. Commonwealth, 841 S.W.2d 166 (Ky. 1992). “Appellant maintains the 1990 enactment of KRS 500.095, an alternative sentencing statute, indicates legislative intent that community service be considered in every case that may be punished by imprisonment.”
Renaker v. Commonwealth, 889 S.W.2d 819 (Ky. Ct. App. 1994). “At the sentencing hearing, Renaker’s attorney requested that Renaker be sentenced to community service rather than prison, according to KRS 500.095. Additionally, he attached letters and a memorandum to support his position, contending that KRS 500.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.