Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 506.100 (2026)

Criminal facilitation -- Exemptions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A person is not guilty of criminal facilitation when:

(1) The crime facilitated is so defined that his conduct is inevitably incident to its commission; or

(2) Prior to the commission of the crime facilitated he makes a substantial effort to prevent the commission of that crime. Effective: January 1, 1975 History: Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 58, effective January 1, 1975.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2016–2016 · leading case: Iris Jennings v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 490 S.W.3d 339 (Ky. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Iris Jennings v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 490 S.W.3d 339 (Ky. 2016). · cites it 18× “The trial court did not err by not including a jury instruction based upon KRS 506.100(1). In a cross motion for discretionary review, which was also granted, Appellee challenged the Court of Appeals’ conclusions that the trial court properly overruled her motions for a directed…”

Iris Jennings v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2016). · cites it 18× “The trial court did not err by not including a jury instruction based upon KRS 506.100(1). In a cross motion for discretionary review, which was also granted, Appellee challenged the Court of Appeals' conclusions that the trial court properly overruled her motions for a directed…”

Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Iris Jennings (Ky. 2016). · cites it 18× “The trial court did not err by not including a jury instruction based upon KRS 506.100(1). In a cross motion for discretionary review, which was also granted, Appellee challenged the Court of Appeals' conclusions that the trial court properly overruled her motions for a directed…”

— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 506.100(1) — 3 cases

Iris Jennings v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 490 S.W.3d 339 (Ky. 2016). “The trial court did not err by not including a jury instruction based upon KRS 506.100(1). In a cross motion for discretionary review, which was also granted, Appellee challenged the Court of Appeals’ conclusions that the trial court properly overruled her motions for a directed…”

Iris Jennings v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2016). “The trial court did not err by not including a jury instruction based upon KRS 506.100(1). In a cross motion for discretionary review, which was also granted, Appellee challenged the Court of Appeals' conclusions that the trial court properly overruled her motions for a directed…”

Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Iris Jennings (Ky. 2016). “The trial court did not err by not including a jury instruction based upon KRS 506.100(1). In a cross motion for discretionary review, which was also granted, Appellee challenged the Court of Appeals' conclusions that the trial court properly overruled her motions for a directed…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.